IFRS 9 ECL
Calculator

IFRS 9 Simplified Approach — Complete Methodology

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments replaced IAS 39 with a forward-looking expected credit loss model that fundamentally changed how entities recognise impairment on financial assets. For trade receivables without a significant financing component — which covers the vast majority of commercial receivables — the standard mandates the simplified approach under IFRS 9.5.5.15. This calculator implements that approach using the provision matrix methodology described in IFRS 9.B5.5.35 and illustrated in the standard's Illustrative Example 12 (IE74–IE77).

Unlike the general model (which requires a three-stage assessment of whether credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition), the simplified approach always measures the loss allowance at lifetime expected credit losses. This eliminates the complexity of staging but does not reduce the need for robust estimation. The auditor's role, per ISA 540 (Revised), is to evaluate whether management's ECL estimate — including all underlying assumptions — falls within a reasonable range.

Step 1: Define Aging Buckets

The provision matrix groups trade receivables by shared credit risk characteristics. The most common and practical grouping is by days past due. Standard buckets are: not yet due, 1–30 days, 31–60 days, 61–90 days, 91–180 days, and 180+ days past due. However, IFRS 9 does not prescribe specific aging categories — entities should use buckets that reflect their actual credit risk patterns. For example, a construction company might use longer buckets to accommodate contractual retention periods, while a retail business with high-volume, low-value receivables might use shorter periods.

Step 2: Calculate Historical Loss Rates

For each aging bucket, calculate the historical loss rate as: Historical Credit Losses ÷ Historical Gross Receivables in that bucket. A critical concept that many preparers misunderstand: the same credit loss amount appears in every bucket's numerator because a receivable that ultimately defaults passes through each aging stage before write-off. If €100,000 in receivables was eventually written off, that €100,000 contributes to the numerator for every bucket — from "not yet due" through to the final bucket. The denominator (total gross receivables in each bucket) decreases as receivables age, which naturally produces increasing loss rates across aging buckets.

Historical data should cover a sufficient period to capture a representative credit cycle — typically 3 to 5 years. IFRS 9.B5.5.52 notes that entities should consider whether current observable data is appropriately weighted relative to historical experience. If the entity has limited historical data (for example, a newly established entity), it may use external industry benchmarks as a proxy, but this must be clearly documented.

Step 3: Adjust for Forward-Looking Information

This is the step that distinguishes IFRS 9 from the old IAS 39 incurred-loss model. IFRS 9.5.5.17 requires that expected credit losses reflect reasonable and supportable information about past events, current conditions, and forecasts of future economic conditions. Purely historical loss rates are explicitly NOT IFRS 9 compliant. The forward-looking adjustment is typically applied as a multiplier to historical loss rates: a factor above 1.0 reflects deteriorating economic conditions (increasing expected losses), while a factor below 1.0 reflects improving conditions.

Acceptable forward-looking indicators include GDP growth forecasts, unemployment rate projections, inflation expectations, central bank interest rate paths, industry-specific indices, commodity prices (for relevant sectors), and property market indices. IFRS 9.B5.5.49–B5.5.54 provides guidance on what constitutes reasonable and supportable information. The standard acknowledges that longer-term forecasts become less reliable, and entities may revert to historical averages beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast horizon.

Step 4: Apply Adjusted Rates and Calculate ECL

The ECL for each bucket is calculated as: Gross Carrying Amount × Adjusted Loss Rate (Historical Rate × Forward-Looking Multiplier). The total ECL is the sum across all buckets. The effective overall ECL rate is the total ECL divided by the total gross carrying amount, expressed as a percentage. This single rate provides a useful benchmark for comparing ECL levels across periods and entities.

Probability-Weighted Scenarios (IFRS 9.5.5.18)

IFRS 9.5.5.18 requires that ECL measurements reflect an unbiased, probability-weighted amount. In practice, entities run the ECL calculation under multiple macroeconomic scenarios — typically a base case, a downside scenario, and an upside scenario — and weight the results by their assessed probability. A common weighting is 60% base, 25% downside, 15% upside, but these should reflect the entity's specific circumstances. The probability-weighted ECL is the sum of each scenario's ECL multiplied by its probability. Probabilities must sum to 100%.

Movement Schedule — IFRS 7.35H Disclosure

IFRS 7.35H requires a reconciliation of the loss allowance from opening to closing balance. This reconciliation must show: the opening loss allowance at the start of the period, new provisions charged to profit or loss, reversals credited to profit or loss, amounts written off against the allowance, foreign exchange adjustments, and the closing balance. This disclosure is a mandatory requirement in the financial statements and serves as a key audit working paper. The charge or release to profit or loss is the balancing figure: Closing − Opening + Write-offs − FX adjustments.

ISA 540 Audit Context

ISA 540 (Revised) — Auditing Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures — is the primary standard governing the audit of ECL estimates. The standard requires auditors to understand management's estimation process, evaluate the reasonableness of significant assumptions, and test the accuracy and completeness of underlying data. For ECL estimates, the most effective approach is often developing an independent auditor's estimate (using this calculator) and comparing it to management's recorded provision. Differences are evaluated against performance materiality. Common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates include: insufficient historical data periods, absent or superficial forward-looking adjustments, failure to apply probability-weighted scenarios, and inadequate documentation of the basis for key assumptions.