Provision Matrix
Define aging buckets, enter gross carrying amounts and historical loss rates. Per IFRS 9.B5.5.35.
Forward-Looking Adjustment
Required by IFRS 9.5.5.17. Purely historical rates are not IFRS 9 compliant.
Advanced Features
Optional: probability-weighted scenarios, movement schedule, specific assessment, and entity details.
IFRS 9 ECL Audit Working Paper Template — free PDF
Practical audit guide covering the simplified approach provision matrix methodology, forward-looking adjustment documentation template, probability-weighted scenario framework, IFRS 7.35H movement schedule template, common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates, and industry benchmark loss rates for 12 sectors.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
IFRS 9 Expected Credit Losses for Agriculture
Agricultural and agribusiness entities operate in a uniquely seasonal and weather-dependent environment that directly affects the credit risk profile of trade receivables. Under IFRS 9, agricultural receivables require ECL assessment using the simplified approach, with the provision matrix methodology adapted for the distinctive payment patterns and risk drivers of the agricultural sector. Commodity trading receivables from produce buyers are subject to price volatility that can trigger payment disputes or defaults when market prices move against the buyer. Government subsidy receivables (EU Common Agricultural Policy payments, national agricultural support programmes) are low-risk but compliance-dependent. Cooperative member receivables represent a unique category where the debtor is also an owner-member of the entity. The forward-looking adjustment for agricultural ECL must consider weather forecasts and crop yield expectations alongside standard macroeconomic indicators, because a poor harvest in the entity's region directly affects both its customers' ability to pay and the entity's own financial resilience.
Receivable Characteristics — Agriculture
Commodity trading receivables are the largest category for most agricultural entities. These arise from the sale of crops, livestock, dairy, or processed agricultural products to buyers including processors, traders, retailers, and exporters. Payment terms vary widely: spot market sales may be settled within 7 days, while contract sales to processors may have 30–60 day terms. Government subsidy receivables include EU CAP direct payments, environmental stewardship scheme payments, and national agricultural support grants — these are generally low-risk but may be conditional on compliance with environmental or production standards. Cooperative member receivables arise when members have outstanding contributions or levy payments — the relationship between debtor and creditor is complex because the member is also an owner of the cooperative. Agricultural input supplier rebates and volume discounts create receivable balances from seed, fertiliser, and chemical suppliers.
Forward-Looking Factors
Agricultural ECL forward-looking indicators are uniquely weather-dependent. Crop yield forecasts and seasonal weather outlooks directly affect the creditworthiness of agricultural buyers and traders. Commodity price futures provide market expectations for produce values — declining prices may trigger buyer defaults on contracted purchase commitments. Input cost trends (fertiliser, energy, feed) affect the profitability and therefore payment capacity of farming customers. Agricultural policy developments (CAP reform, trade agreements, export restrictions) can materially affect the agricultural economy. For livestock operations, disease outbreak risk (avian flu, African swine fever) represents a tail risk that can rapidly deteriorate credit quality across the supply chain.
Key forward-looking indicators for agriculture:
- Commodity price forecasts (crops, livestock)
- Weather and climate forecasts (drought, flood risk)
- Agricultural subsidy policy changes (CAP, farm bill)
- Input cost trends (fertiliser, energy, feed)
- Trade policy for agricultural exports
- Crop yield forecasts
Regulatory and Audit Context
Auditors of agricultural entities should consider the seasonal timing of ECL estimates — an ECL calculation performed during or immediately after harvest will reflect a different receivable profile than one performed in the pre-planting season. The IAS 41 Agriculture standard creates unique balance sheet items (biological assets at fair value) that interact with the receivable analysis. Government subsidy receivables should be assessed for compliance risk — if the entity has not met all conditions for subsidy payment, the receivable may be overstated. Common audit findings include: failure to consider weather-related forward-looking factors, treating subsidy receivables as zero-risk without documented compliance assessment, and inadequate consideration of commodity price volatility on buyer credit risk.
Agricultural entities should ensure that IAS 41 biological asset measurements and IFRS 9 receivable assessments are consistent — crop losses that reduce biological asset values may also signal increased credit risk for agricultural trading receivables.
Worked Example — Westland Agri-Cooperative
Westland Agri-Cooperative processes and markets dairy and grain products with €1.6M in trade receivables at year-end (December — post-harvest). The customer base includes 8 major food processors (55% of receivables), 30 commodity traders (30%), and government subsidy receivables (15%). The FL factor of 1.10× reflects rising input costs and weather-related uncertainty in the upcoming growing season.
| Bucket | Amount | Rate | ECL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet due | €850.000 | 0.44% | €3.740 |
| 1–30 days | €340.000 | 1.10% | €3.740 |
| 31–60 days | €190.000 | 2.75% | €5.225 |
| 61–90 days | €110.000 | 7.70% | €8.470 |
| 91–180 days | €70.000 | 17.60% | €12.320 |
| 180+ days | €40.000 | 46.20% | €18.480 |
| Total | €1.600.000 | €51.975 |
Forward-looking adjustment factor: 1.1× applied to all buckets. Rates shown above are adjusted rates (historical × FL factor).