IFRS 9 · Agriculture

IFRS 9 ECL Calculator
for Agriculture

Pre-configured for agricultural entities with commodity trading receivable defaults, government subsidy receivable considerations, cooperative member receivables, and weather/crop-linked forward-looking factors.

Benchmark rates loaded. These are illustrative only. Replace with entity-specific historical loss data for IFRS 9 compliance.

Provision Matrix

Define aging buckets, enter gross carrying amounts and historical loss rates. Per IFRS 9.B5.5.35.

Forward-Looking Adjustment

Required by IFRS 9.5.5.17. Purely historical rates are not IFRS 9 compliant.

Advanced Features

Optional: probability-weighted scenarios, movement schedule, specific assessment, and entity details.

IFRS 9 ECL Audit Working Paper Template — free PDF

Practical audit guide covering the simplified approach provision matrix methodology, forward-looking adjustment documentation template, probability-weighted scenario framework, IFRS 7.35H movement schedule template, common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates, and industry benchmark loss rates for 12 sectors.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

IFRS 9 Expected Credit Losses for Agriculture

Agricultural and agribusiness entities operate in a uniquely seasonal and weather-dependent environment that directly affects the credit risk profile of trade receivables. Under IFRS 9, agricultural receivables require ECL assessment using the simplified approach, with the provision matrix methodology adapted for the distinctive payment patterns and risk drivers of the agricultural sector. Commodity trading receivables from produce buyers are subject to price volatility that can trigger payment disputes or defaults when market prices move against the buyer. Government subsidy receivables (EU Common Agricultural Policy payments, national agricultural support programmes) are low-risk but compliance-dependent. Cooperative member receivables represent a unique category where the debtor is also an owner-member of the entity. The forward-looking adjustment for agricultural ECL must consider weather forecasts and crop yield expectations alongside standard macroeconomic indicators, because a poor harvest in the entity's region directly affects both its customers' ability to pay and the entity's own financial resilience.

Receivable Characteristics — Agriculture

Commodity trading receivables are the largest category for most agricultural entities. These arise from the sale of crops, livestock, dairy, or processed agricultural products to buyers including processors, traders, retailers, and exporters. Payment terms vary widely: spot market sales may be settled within 7 days, while contract sales to processors may have 30–60 day terms. Government subsidy receivables include EU CAP direct payments, environmental stewardship scheme payments, and national agricultural support grants — these are generally low-risk but may be conditional on compliance with environmental or production standards. Cooperative member receivables arise when members have outstanding contributions or levy payments — the relationship between debtor and creditor is complex because the member is also an owner of the cooperative. Agricultural input supplier rebates and volume discounts create receivable balances from seed, fertiliser, and chemical suppliers.

Forward-Looking Factors

Agricultural ECL forward-looking indicators are uniquely weather-dependent. Crop yield forecasts and seasonal weather outlooks directly affect the creditworthiness of agricultural buyers and traders. Commodity price futures provide market expectations for produce values — declining prices may trigger buyer defaults on contracted purchase commitments. Input cost trends (fertiliser, energy, feed) affect the profitability and therefore payment capacity of farming customers. Agricultural policy developments (CAP reform, trade agreements, export restrictions) can materially affect the agricultural economy. For livestock operations, disease outbreak risk (avian flu, African swine fever) represents a tail risk that can rapidly deteriorate credit quality across the supply chain.

Key forward-looking indicators for agriculture:

  • Commodity price forecasts (crops, livestock)
  • Weather and climate forecasts (drought, flood risk)
  • Agricultural subsidy policy changes (CAP, farm bill)
  • Input cost trends (fertiliser, energy, feed)
  • Trade policy for agricultural exports
  • Crop yield forecasts

Regulatory and Audit Context

Auditors of agricultural entities should consider the seasonal timing of ECL estimates — an ECL calculation performed during or immediately after harvest will reflect a different receivable profile than one performed in the pre-planting season. The IAS 41 Agriculture standard creates unique balance sheet items (biological assets at fair value) that interact with the receivable analysis. Government subsidy receivables should be assessed for compliance risk — if the entity has not met all conditions for subsidy payment, the receivable may be overstated. Common audit findings include: failure to consider weather-related forward-looking factors, treating subsidy receivables as zero-risk without documented compliance assessment, and inadequate consideration of commodity price volatility on buyer credit risk.

Agricultural entities should ensure that IAS 41 biological asset measurements and IFRS 9 receivable assessments are consistent — crop losses that reduce biological asset values may also signal increased credit risk for agricultural trading receivables.

Worked Example — Westland Agri-Cooperative

Westland Agri-Cooperative processes and markets dairy and grain products with €1.6M in trade receivables at year-end (December — post-harvest). The customer base includes 8 major food processors (55% of receivables), 30 commodity traders (30%), and government subsidy receivables (15%). The FL factor of 1.10× reflects rising input costs and weather-related uncertainty in the upcoming growing season.

Bucket Amount Rate ECL
Not yet due €850.000 0.44% €3.740
1–30 days €340.000 1.10% €3.740
31–60 days €190.000 2.75% €5.225
61–90 days €110.000 7.70% €8.470
91–180 days €70.000 17.60% €12.320
180+ days €40.000 46.20% €18.480
Total €1.600.000 €51.975

Forward-looking adjustment factor: 1.1× applied to all buckets. Rates shown above are adjusted rates (historical × FL factor).

Typical receivable profile: Agricultural receivables include commodity trading receivables (from buyers of produce), government subsidy receivables (low risk but compliance-dependent), cooperative member receivables, agricultural input supplier rebates, and land lease receivables. Seasonal harvest-linked payment patterns create concentrated receivable balances during and after harvest periods.

Frequently Asked Questions — Agriculture

How should weather risk be incorporated into agricultural ECL forward-looking adjustments?
Weather risk is a legitimate forward-looking factor for agricultural ECL because adverse weather (drought, flooding, frost) directly affects crop yields, which in turn affects the financial capacity of agricultural buyers and the entity's own customers. Incorporate weather risk through the forward-looking adjustment factor: if seasonal weather forecasts indicate adverse conditions, increase the FL factor (e.g., from 1.0 to 1.15–1.25). This adjustment should be documented with reference to specific weather forecast data and the entity's historical experience of weather-related credit losses.
Should government agricultural subsidy receivables be assessed for ECL?
Yes, government subsidy receivables are financial assets within IFRS 9 scope and require ECL assessment. However, the credit risk is typically very low (government entities rarely default on subsidy obligations). The primary risk is compliance — if the entity has not met all conditions for payment, the receivable may be impaired or may not be a valid receivable at all. Assess whether conditions have been met and apply a minimal ECL rate (0.01–0.1%) for compliant subsidy receivables.
How do commodity price movements affect agricultural ECL?
Commodity price declines can trigger buyer defaults when the market price falls below the contracted purchase price — the buyer may have economic incentive to default on the contract. This is particularly relevant for forward sales contracts. The ECL forward-looking adjustment should consider commodity futures prices for the entity's products. If futures prices indicate significant declines, increase the FL factor for receivables from commodity buyers. Historical analysis of the correlation between commodity price declines and credit losses provides the basis for calibrating this adjustment.
What is the ECL treatment for cooperative member receivables?
Cooperative member receivables are within IFRS 9 scope but have a unique risk profile because the debtor is also an owner-member. Members may be more willing to pay cooperative obligations than commercial debts due to their ownership interest, but financially stressed members may prioritise other obligations. Assess member receivables based on historical collection rates for member obligations. For cooperatives with mandatory levy contributions, the enforceability mechanism (potential loss of membership benefits) provides credit risk mitigation.
How should the seasonal nature of agriculture affect the ECL timing?
Agricultural receivables are highly seasonal — post-harvest periods generate peak receivable volumes as produce is sold and billed. An ECL estimate at a harvest-period reporting date will show higher gross receivables with potentially different risk characteristics than an off-season estimate. Ensure that historical loss rate data is analysed on a seasonal basis to identify whether harvest-period receivables carry different credit risk. The forward-looking adjustment should consider the upcoming growing season conditions, not just general economic forecasts.