AASB 9

IFRS 9 ECL Calculator
Australia

IFRS 9 expected credit loss calculator with Australia-specific regulatory context, ASIC / AUASB expectations, and local macroeconomic indicators for forward-looking adjustments.

Provision Matrix

Define aging buckets, enter gross carrying amounts and historical loss rates. Per IFRS 9.B5.5.35.

Forward-Looking Adjustment

Required by IFRS 9.5.5.17. Purely historical rates are not IFRS 9 compliant.

Advanced Features

Optional: probability-weighted scenarios, movement schedule, specific assessment, and entity details.

IFRS 9 ECL Audit Working Paper Template — free PDF

Practical audit guide covering the simplified approach provision matrix methodology, forward-looking adjustment documentation template, probability-weighted scenario framework, IFRS 7.35H movement schedule template, common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates, and industry benchmark loss rates for 12 sectors.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

IFRS 9 ECL in Australia — AASB 9

Australia adopted the IFRS 9 equivalent through AASB 9 Financial Instruments, effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. AASB 9 is issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board and is functionally equivalent to IASB IFRS 9, with limited Australian-specific paragraphs (marked with 'Aus' prefix) that address scope modifications for certain not-for-profit and public sector entities. The expected credit loss impairment model in AASB 9 is identical to IFRS 9 Section 5.5 for for-profit entities. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) conducts surveillance of financial reporting by Australian listed entities and has published findings reports and regulatory guides addressing AASB 9 implementation quality. The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) issues auditing standards that are based on International Standards on Auditing and provides guidance on auditing accounting estimates including ECL. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) provides additional supervisory expectations for authorised deposit-taking institutions regarding ECL model governance and capital adequacy implications.

Regulatory Context — ASIC / AUASB

ASIC has conducted targeted surveillance of AASB 9 implementation, with findings published in its annual financial reporting surveillance reports. Key ASIC observations include concerns about the adequacy of forward-looking information incorporated into ECL models, the quality of disclosures regarding significant judgements and estimation uncertainty, the consistency between risk management practices and ECL measurement methodology, and the transparency of management overlay processes. ASIC has used its regulatory powers to require companies to improve their ECL disclosures and, in some cases, to restate financial statements where ECL measurement was materially misstated. The AUASB has issued guidance statements addressing the audit of accounting estimates under ASA 540, with specific reference to ECL as a complex estimate requiring enhanced audit procedures. APRA's Prudential Standard APS 220 (Credit Risk Management) and the associated practice guide set expectations for ECL model validation, data quality, and governance for regulated financial institutions.

Practical Guidance for Australia

Australian entities applying the simplified approach for trade receivables under AASB 9.5.5.15 should build provision matrices segmented by customer characteristics relevant to the Australian market. Common segmentation includes industry sector (aligned with ANZSIC codes), customer geography (state-based or metropolitan versus regional), customer size, payment terms, and ageing bracket. Forward-looking adjustments should reference Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) cash rate decisions and economic outlook statements, ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) data on GDP growth, unemployment rates (particularly the underemployment rate, which is significant in Australia), business confidence indices from NAB or Westpac-Melbourne Institute, and sector-specific indicators. For entities with exposure to the mining and resources sector, commodity price forecasts from the Department of Industry, Science and Resources should be incorporated. Agricultural sector exposures should reference Bureau of Meteorology drought forecasts and ABARES agricultural outlook reports, given the material impact of weather on rural credit risk.

Audit Expectations

Australian auditors must apply ASA 540 Auditing Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures, which requires a risk-based approach to auditing ECL. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's audit inspection program has identified ECL as an area requiring improved audit quality. Common inspection findings include insufficient challenge of management's ECL methodology, limited testing of the completeness and accuracy of data inputs, failure to perform independent assessment of forward-looking scenario reasonableness, and inadequate evaluation of management overlays. The AUASB expects auditors to consider engaging credit risk specialists for complex ECL models and to perform retrospective reviews of prior-period ECL estimates against actual outcomes.

Australia-Specific Considerations

Australian-specific ECL considerations include the impact of geographic and climatic risks on credit quality. Australia's vulnerability to bushfires, floods, droughts, and cyclones means that natural disaster events can cause sudden, localised spikes in credit losses. Entities with receivable portfolios concentrated in disaster-prone regions should incorporate natural disaster risk into their forward-looking ECL framework. The Australian economy's significant exposure to the mining, agriculture, and real estate sectors creates concentration risks that should be reflected in ECL segmentation. Australia's trade relationship with China, as its largest trading partner, means that changes in Chinese economic conditions and trade policy can materially affect the credit quality of Australian export receivables. The Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) provides a mechanism for registering security interests that may reduce loss given default for secured receivables. Additionally, the Australian government's insolvency reform introducing the small business restructuring process affects recovery assumptions for SME receivables.

Forward-Looking Data Sources

RBA Cash Rate and Economic Outlook
Source: Reserve Bank of Australia
Monetary policy decisions and economic projections including GDP growth, unemployment, and inflation used for ECL scenario development
ABS Unemployment Rate
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics
Monthly labour force data including unemployment and underemployment rates, directly correlated with consumer and SME credit deterioration
NAB Business Confidence Index
Source: National Australia Bank
Monthly survey of business sentiment covering trading conditions, profitability, and employment, useful for sector-specific ECL adjustments
ABS Business Indicators
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics
Quarterly data on company profits, inventories, and sales providing evidence of corporate financial health and credit risk trends
ASIC Insolvency Statistics
Source: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Quarterly data on corporate insolvency appointments including administrations, liquidations, and receiverships across Australian industries
Bureau of Meteorology Seasonal Outlook
Source: Bureau of Meteorology
Three-month climate outlook covering rainfall, temperature, and drought conditions relevant to agricultural sector ECL adjustments

Common Inspection Findings

Forward-looking macro-economic adjustments not adequately calibrated — reliance on historical loss rates without adjustment for current and projected economic conditions

Natural disaster and climate risk not considered in ECL estimates despite material geographic concentration in disaster-prone areas

ECL disclosures did not meet AASB 7 requirements — sensitivity analysis and significant judgement explanations absent or insufficiently detailed

Management overlays not adequately governed — no formal approval process or documented rationale for post-model adjustments

Auditor did not perform retrospective back-testing of prior-period ECL estimates against actual credit loss outcomes

Frequently Asked Questions — Australia

Is AASB 9 identical to IFRS 9 for ECL purposes?
For for-profit entities, the ECL impairment model in AASB 9 is identical to IFRS 9 Section 5.5. The Australian-specific paragraphs (Aus paragraphs) primarily address scope modifications for not-for-profit and public sector entities. The simplified approach for trade receivables, the three-stage impairment model, and the requirements for forward-looking information are all the same. Australian entities can therefore apply IASB implementation guidance and IFRS Interpretations Committee agenda decisions directly.
What has ASIC found in its surveillance of AASB 9 ECL implementation?
ASIC's findings reports have identified several areas of concern: insufficient forward-looking adjustment of historical loss rates, generic disclosures that do not reflect entity-specific credit risk characteristics, inadequate sensitivity analysis for material ECL estimates, inconsistency between risk management practices described in AASB 7 disclosures and the ECL methodology actually applied, and failure to consider the impact of natural disasters and climate events on forward-looking credit risk assessments.
What RBA data should Australian entities use for forward-looking ECL scenarios?
The Reserve Bank of Australia publishes quarterly Statements on Monetary Policy containing GDP growth forecasts, unemployment projections, inflation expectations, and housing price assessments. RBA Board meeting minutes provide forward guidance on cash rate movements. For scenario development, entities should also reference the RBA's Financial Stability Review, which identifies key risks to the Australian financial system, and ABS data on business conditions and consumer confidence. The RBA's liaison program reports provide qualitative insights into sector-specific conditions.
How should Australian entities incorporate natural disaster risk into ECL estimates?
Natural disaster risk should be incorporated through forward-looking adjustments that reflect the probability and expected impact of climate-related events. Entities with receivable concentrations in disaster-prone areas (e.g., northern Queensland for cyclones, eastern states for bushfires) should maintain geographic segmentation in their provision matrices and apply higher ECL rates to exposed regions during periods of elevated risk. Historical loss data from prior disaster events should be used to calibrate the magnitude of adjustments. The Bureau of Meteorology's seasonal outlooks provide forward-looking inputs for climate-related risk assessment.
What are APRA's expectations for ECL model governance at Australian financial institutions?
APRA's Prudential Standard APS 220 and associated guidance require authorised deposit-taking institutions to maintain robust ECL model governance frameworks including formal model documentation, independent model validation at least annually, regular back-testing of model performance against actual outcomes, board or board-committee oversight of ECL methodology and material assumptions, and clear escalation procedures for model override and management overlay decisions. APRA conducts supervisory reviews that assess compliance with these expectations.

Other Country Guides

← General Calculator United Kingdom Germany Netherlands France Belgium Canada Ireland South Africa UAE
Financial Ratio Calculator Going Concern Checklist Materiality Calculator