Provision Matrix
Define aging buckets, enter gross carrying amounts and historical loss rates. Per IFRS 9.B5.5.35.
Forward-Looking Adjustment
Required by IFRS 9.5.5.17. Purely historical rates are not IFRS 9 compliant.
Advanced Features
Optional: probability-weighted scenarios, movement schedule, specific assessment, and entity details.
IFRS 9 ECL Audit Working Paper Template — free PDF
Practical audit guide covering the simplified approach provision matrix methodology, forward-looking adjustment documentation template, probability-weighted scenario framework, IFRS 7.35H movement schedule template, common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates, and industry benchmark loss rates for 12 sectors.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
IFRS 9 Expected Credit Losses for Insurance
Insurance entities have a distinctive receivable profile that requires careful IFRS 9 application. Premium receivables — the most significant category — arise when policyholders are invoiced for premiums but payment has not yet been received. Under IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts, the boundary between insurance contract assets/liabilities and trade receivables is a critical classification question that directly affects which amounts require IFRS 9 ECL assessment. Amounts within the IFRS 17 measurement boundary are not separately assessed for IFRS 9 impairment — they are included in the insurance contract liability measurement. However, premium receivables outside the IFRS 17 boundary, broker receivables, reinsurance recoverables, and other trade receivables fall within IFRS 9 scope and require simplified approach ECL assessment.
Receivable Characteristics — Insurance
Premium receivables from direct policyholders typically have relatively low credit risk because insurers can cancel coverage for non-payment, creating a natural credit risk mitigation mechanism. Broker receivables are an intermediary risk — the insurer's exposure is to the broker's creditworthiness rather than the underlying policyholder. Reinsurance recoverables from reinsurers represent potentially large balances with credit risk concentrated among a small number of rated reinsurance counterparties. Co-insurance receivables from partner insurers carry the credit risk of fellow insurance companies. Policyholder deductible receivables and subrogation receivables represent smaller but more granular categories with varying credit risk profiles.
Forward-Looking Factors
Forward-looking indicators for insurance receivable ECL should focus on factors that affect the creditworthiness of the entity's counterparties. For policyholder premium receivables, consumer/business financial health indicators (unemployment, GDP growth) are relevant. For broker receivables, the financial health of the intermediary sector and any broker consolidation trends matter. For reinsurance recoverables, reinsurer credit ratings, solvency ratios, and catastrophe loss experience are the primary indicators. The interest rate environment affects both policyholder payment behaviour and the investment returns that support reinsurer solvency.
Key forward-looking indicators for insurance:
- Insurance market combined ratio trends
- Reinsurer credit ratings and solvency ratios
- Interest rate environment (investment returns)
- Natural catastrophe loss trends
- Solvency II/IFRS 17 regulatory developments
Regulatory and Audit Context
The IFRS 9/IFRS 17 interaction is the primary audit complexity for insurance ECL. Auditors must verify that management has correctly classified receivables between the IFRS 17 measurement boundary (where impairment is part of the insurance contract measurement) and IFRS 9 scope (where the simplified approach ECL applies). Solvency II regulatory capital requirements may also influence the conservatism of ECL estimates for European insurers. Common audit findings include: failure to separately assess reinsurance recoverables for credit impairment, inadequate documentation of the IFRS 17/IFRS 9 boundary classification, and applying zero ECL to premium receivables without documented justification.
Insurance entities transitioning to IFRS 17 should ensure consistent classification of receivables between IFRS 9 and IFRS 17 scope. Solvency II (EU) and equivalent regimes may influence the conservatism of ECL estimates.
Worked Example — Nordic Mutual Insurance
Nordic Mutual Insurance has €4.2M in trade receivables comprising premium receivables from policyholders (€2.5M), broker receivables (€1.2M), and sundry operational receivables (€0.5M). Reinsurance recoverables of €18M are assessed separately under a specific assessment. The neutral FL factor (1.0×) reflects stable insurance market conditions.
| Bucket | Amount | Rate | ECL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet due | €2.800.000 | 0.10% | €2.800 |
| 1–30 days | €700.000 | 0.40% | €2.800 |
| 31–60 days | €380.000 | 1.20% | €4.560 |
| 61–90 days | €180.000 | 4.00% | €7.200 |
| 91–180 days | €90.000 | 10.00% | €9.000 |
| 180+ days | €50.000 | 30.00% | €15.000 |
| Total | €4.200.000 | €41.360 |
Forward-looking adjustment factor: 1× applied to all buckets. Rates shown above are adjusted rates (historical × FL factor).