IFRS 9 · Insurance

IFRS 9 ECL Calculator
for Insurance

Pre-configured for insurance entities with premium receivable defaults, broker receivable considerations, and guidance on the interaction between IFRS 9 and IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts.

Benchmark rates loaded. These are illustrative only. Replace with entity-specific historical loss data for IFRS 9 compliance.

Provision Matrix

Define aging buckets, enter gross carrying amounts and historical loss rates. Per IFRS 9.B5.5.35.

Forward-Looking Adjustment

Required by IFRS 9.5.5.17. Purely historical rates are not IFRS 9 compliant.

Advanced Features

Optional: probability-weighted scenarios, movement schedule, specific assessment, and entity details.

IFRS 9 ECL Audit Working Paper Template — free PDF

Practical audit guide covering the simplified approach provision matrix methodology, forward-looking adjustment documentation template, probability-weighted scenario framework, IFRS 7.35H movement schedule template, common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates, and industry benchmark loss rates for 12 sectors.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

IFRS 9 Expected Credit Losses for Insurance

Insurance entities have a distinctive receivable profile that requires careful IFRS 9 application. Premium receivables — the most significant category — arise when policyholders are invoiced for premiums but payment has not yet been received. Under IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts, the boundary between insurance contract assets/liabilities and trade receivables is a critical classification question that directly affects which amounts require IFRS 9 ECL assessment. Amounts within the IFRS 17 measurement boundary are not separately assessed for IFRS 9 impairment — they are included in the insurance contract liability measurement. However, premium receivables outside the IFRS 17 boundary, broker receivables, reinsurance recoverables, and other trade receivables fall within IFRS 9 scope and require simplified approach ECL assessment.

Receivable Characteristics — Insurance

Premium receivables from direct policyholders typically have relatively low credit risk because insurers can cancel coverage for non-payment, creating a natural credit risk mitigation mechanism. Broker receivables are an intermediary risk — the insurer's exposure is to the broker's creditworthiness rather than the underlying policyholder. Reinsurance recoverables from reinsurers represent potentially large balances with credit risk concentrated among a small number of rated reinsurance counterparties. Co-insurance receivables from partner insurers carry the credit risk of fellow insurance companies. Policyholder deductible receivables and subrogation receivables represent smaller but more granular categories with varying credit risk profiles.

Forward-Looking Factors

Forward-looking indicators for insurance receivable ECL should focus on factors that affect the creditworthiness of the entity's counterparties. For policyholder premium receivables, consumer/business financial health indicators (unemployment, GDP growth) are relevant. For broker receivables, the financial health of the intermediary sector and any broker consolidation trends matter. For reinsurance recoverables, reinsurer credit ratings, solvency ratios, and catastrophe loss experience are the primary indicators. The interest rate environment affects both policyholder payment behaviour and the investment returns that support reinsurer solvency.

Key forward-looking indicators for insurance:

  • Insurance market combined ratio trends
  • Reinsurer credit ratings and solvency ratios
  • Interest rate environment (investment returns)
  • Natural catastrophe loss trends
  • Solvency II/IFRS 17 regulatory developments

Regulatory and Audit Context

The IFRS 9/IFRS 17 interaction is the primary audit complexity for insurance ECL. Auditors must verify that management has correctly classified receivables between the IFRS 17 measurement boundary (where impairment is part of the insurance contract measurement) and IFRS 9 scope (where the simplified approach ECL applies). Solvency II regulatory capital requirements may also influence the conservatism of ECL estimates for European insurers. Common audit findings include: failure to separately assess reinsurance recoverables for credit impairment, inadequate documentation of the IFRS 17/IFRS 9 boundary classification, and applying zero ECL to premium receivables without documented justification.

Insurance entities transitioning to IFRS 17 should ensure consistent classification of receivables between IFRS 9 and IFRS 17 scope. Solvency II (EU) and equivalent regimes may influence the conservatism of ECL estimates.

Worked Example — Nordic Mutual Insurance

Nordic Mutual Insurance has €4.2M in trade receivables comprising premium receivables from policyholders (€2.5M), broker receivables (€1.2M), and sundry operational receivables (€0.5M). Reinsurance recoverables of €18M are assessed separately under a specific assessment. The neutral FL factor (1.0×) reflects stable insurance market conditions.

Bucket Amount Rate ECL
Not yet due €2.800.000 0.10% €2.800
1–30 days €700.000 0.40% €2.800
31–60 days €380.000 1.20% €4.560
61–90 days €180.000 4.00% €7.200
91–180 days €90.000 10.00% €9.000
180+ days €50.000 30.00% €15.000
Total €4.200.000 €41.360

Forward-looking adjustment factor: 1× applied to all buckets. Rates shown above are adjusted rates (historical × FL factor).

Typical receivable profile: Insurance trade receivables include premium receivables from policyholders and brokers, reinsurance receivables from reinsurers, and co-insurance receivables from partner insurers. Premium receivables typically have low loss rates because policies can be cancelled for non-payment, but broker receivables carry intermediary credit risk.

Frequently Asked Questions — Insurance

How does IFRS 17 affect the IFRS 9 ECL calculation for insurance receivables?
Amounts within the IFRS 17 insurance contract measurement boundary are not separately assessed under IFRS 9 — impairment is incorporated into the insurance liability measurement. Only receivables outside the IFRS 17 boundary (such as overdue premium receivables where the contract boundary has been reached, broker receivables, and sundry operational receivables) require IFRS 9 ECL assessment. The classification boundary depends on the entity's cancellation rights and the premium payment terms relative to the coverage period.
Should reinsurance recoverables be included in the IFRS 9 provision matrix?
Reinsurance recoverables are within IFRS 9 scope but are typically not suitable for collective provision matrix assessment due to their concentrated nature (a small number of large reinsurer counterparties). Instead, they should be assessed specifically based on each reinsurer's credit rating, solvency ratio, and claims settlement history. If a reinsurer is rated A or above with strong solvency, the ECL may be close to zero, but this must be documented.
How should broker receivables be assessed for ECL?
Broker receivables carry intermediary credit risk — the insurer's exposure is to the broker, not the underlying policyholder. These should be assessed based on the broker's creditworthiness, not the policyholder's. For large broker relationships, consider specific assessment based on the broker's financial position. For smaller brokers, the collective provision matrix approach is appropriate, but the loss rate should reflect broker default experience rather than policyholder default experience.
Can insurers apply zero ECL to premium receivables since policies can be cancelled?
While the ability to cancel coverage for non-payment significantly reduces credit risk, it does not eliminate it entirely. There is typically a notice period during which coverage continues despite non-payment, and claims may arise during that period. IFRS 9 requires a non-zero ECL even where credit risk is low. The appropriate approach is to apply a very low loss rate (0.05–0.2%) to current premium receivables, reflecting the residual risk during the cancellation notice period.
What audit procedures should be applied to insurance ECL estimates?
Key audit procedures for insurance ECL include: verifying the IFRS 17/IFRS 9 boundary classification, testing the completeness of receivables included in the ECL assessment, evaluating loss rates against historical claims cancellation data, assessing the creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties, and testing the forward-looking adjustment against relevant market indicators. For IFRS 17 transition periods, additional attention is needed to ensure consistent treatment year-on-year.