IFRS 9 · Hospitality

IFRS 9 ECL Calculator
for Hospitality

Pre-configured for hospitality entities where most revenue is prepaid but corporate accounts, event receivables, and OTA (online travel agency) receivables require IFRS 9 ECL assessment.

Benchmark rates loaded. These are illustrative only. Replace with entity-specific historical loss data for IFRS 9 compliance.

Provision Matrix

Define aging buckets, enter gross carrying amounts and historical loss rates. Per IFRS 9.B5.5.35.

Forward-Looking Adjustment

Required by IFRS 9.5.5.17. Purely historical rates are not IFRS 9 compliant.

Advanced Features

Optional: probability-weighted scenarios, movement schedule, specific assessment, and entity details.

IFRS 9 ECL Audit Working Paper Template — free PDF

Practical audit guide covering the simplified approach provision matrix methodology, forward-looking adjustment documentation template, probability-weighted scenario framework, IFRS 7.35H movement schedule template, common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates, and industry benchmark loss rates for 12 sectors.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

IFRS 9 Expected Credit Losses for Hospitality

Hospitality and tourism entities have a distinctive IFRS 9 profile because the majority of revenue is collected at or before the point of service — through prepaid online bookings, credit card settlement at checkout, or advance deposits for events. This means trade receivable balances are relatively low compared to revenue. However, several receivable categories do require IFRS 9 ECL assessment: corporate account receivables from business clients with monthly billing arrangements, event and conference receivables from corporate event bookings, OTA (online travel agency) receivables where commission calculations and virtual card settlements may create outstanding balances, and group booking receivables from tour operators and travel agents. The credit risk varies significantly across these categories and warrants separate assessment within the provision matrix.

Receivable Characteristics — Hospitality

Corporate account receivables represent the largest category for hotels and restaurant groups that offer credit terms to business clients. These are typically billed monthly and carry moderate credit risk. Event and conference receivables can be individually large (a single conference booking may exceed €50K) and may be subject to post-event disputes over service quality or quantity. OTA receivables are unique — they represent amounts owed by online platforms after deducting commissions, and disputes frequently arise over commission calculations, virtual card payment failures, and rate parity violations. Group booking receivables from tour operators carry the credit risk of the tour operator rather than the end traveller — tour operator insolvencies have historically caused significant losses in the hospitality sector. Franchise fee receivables (for hotel chains operating under a franchise model) represent ongoing obligations from franchisees.

Forward-Looking Factors

Tourism demand indicators are the primary forward-looking data for hospitality ECL. Tourism arrival statistics and occupancy rate forecasts directly correlate with the financial health of hospitality counterparties. Consumer confidence indices affect discretionary travel spending and therefore the payment capacity of end consumers and the booking volumes of corporate clients and tour operators. Business travel expenditure indices affect corporate account receivable risk. Geopolitical events (travel advisories, visa policy changes, health restrictions) can rapidly affect tourism demand and counterparty credit risk. For resort and seasonal properties, weather forecasts and climate trends may affect seasonal demand patterns.

Key forward-looking indicators for hospitality:

  • Tourism arrival statistics and forecasts
  • Hotel occupancy rate trends
  • Consumer confidence and discretionary spending
  • Business travel expenditure indices
  • Airline capacity and route announcements

Regulatory and Audit Context

Auditors of hospitality entities should verify that all receivable categories are identified — OTA receivables and franchise fee receivables are sometimes overlooked. The seasonal concentration of revenue and receivables means that the timing of the reporting date relative to peak season significantly affects the ECL calculation. Common audit findings include: omitting OTA receivable ECL (despite platforms carrying intermediary credit risk), failure to specifically assess material event receivables, and inadequate forward-looking adjustment following demand shocks (e.g., travel restrictions, economic downturns). For hotel chains with management agreements, receivables from hotel owners for management fees require assessment based on the financial health of each property owner.

Hospitality entities with management agreements should separately assess receivables from property owners for management fees, which carry the credit risk of the individual property rather than the hotel brand.

Worked Example — Azure Hotels Group

Azure Hotels Group operates 12 hotels across Southern Europe with €920K in trade receivables at year-end (December — low season). Corporate accounts represent 55% of receivables, OTA settlements 25%, and event/conference receivables 20%. The neutral FL factor reflects stable tourism demand and business travel conditions. Note: peak season receivables (August–September) would be approximately 60% higher.

Bucket Amount Rate ECL
Not yet due €560.000 0.20% €1.120
1–30 days €190.000 0.60% €1.140
31–60 days €90.000 1.80% €1.620
61–90 days €45.000 5.00% €2.250
91–180 days €25.000 12.00% €3.000
180+ days €10.000 35.00% €3.500
Total €920.000 €12.630

Forward-looking adjustment factor: 1× applied to all buckets. Rates shown above are adjusted rates (historical × FL factor).

Typical receivable profile: Hospitality receivables are relatively low because most revenue is prepaid or settled at checkout. However, corporate account receivables, event/conference receivables, OTA (online travel agency) receivables with commission disputes, and group booking receivables carry meaningful credit risk. Seasonal concentration is significant — Q3 peak season generates disproportionate receivable volumes.

Frequently Asked Questions — Hospitality

Do hospitality companies need ECL provisions if most revenue is prepaid?
Yes. While individual guest revenue is largely prepaid or settled at checkout, hospitality entities carry trade receivables from corporate accounts, events, OTA platforms, tour operators, and franchise operations. These receivable categories require IFRS 9 ECL assessment under the simplified approach. The low ratio of receivables to revenue does not eliminate the ECL requirement — it simply means the absolute ECL amount is typically smaller than in receivable-intensive industries.
How should OTA (online travel agency) receivables be assessed for ECL?
OTA receivables carry intermediary credit risk — the entity's exposure is to the platform (Booking.com, Expedia, etc.) rather than the end guest. While major OTA platforms are generally creditworthy, disputes over commission calculations, virtual card payment failures, and rate parity violations create receivable balances that may not be fully collectible. Apply a modest loss rate (0.3–1%) to current OTA receivables and higher rates to disputed or aged balances. For smaller or regional OTAs, assess credit risk based on the platform's financial position.
How do seasonal patterns affect hospitality ECL calculations?
Seasonal patterns significantly affect the level and composition of receivables. Peak season (Q3 for European leisure, Q1/Q4 for ski and business travel) generates higher receivable volumes with potentially different credit characteristics. A December year-end for a summer resort property will show relatively low receivables, while a June or September year-end would capture peak-season balances. The ECL estimate should consider whether seasonal receivables carry different credit risk (e.g., peak-season tour operator bookings may be higher-risk due to the operator's cash flow concentration).
Should event and conference receivables be assessed separately?
Material individual event receivables should be specifically assessed rather than included in the collective provision matrix. A single conference booking of €80K has different risk characteristics from 100 corporate account invoices of €800 each, even if they have the same total. Specific assessment considers the client's financial position, the contract terms, any deposit paid, and whether the event has been delivered (post-event disputes are common in hospitality). Smaller event receivables can be included in the collective matrix.
What is a typical ECL rate for hospitality trade receivables?
Effective overall ECL rates for hospitality entities typically range from 0.8% to 2.5% of total gross receivables. Corporate account receivables carry rates of 0.5–1.5%, OTA receivables 0.3–1%, and event receivables 1–3% (reflecting dispute risk). These benchmarks assume normal market conditions — hospitality ECL rates can increase dramatically during demand shocks such as travel restrictions or economic recessions.