Provision Matrix
Define aging buckets, enter gross carrying amounts and historical loss rates. Per IFRS 9.B5.5.35.
Forward-Looking Adjustment
Required by IFRS 9.5.5.17. Purely historical rates are not IFRS 9 compliant.
Advanced Features
Optional: probability-weighted scenarios, movement schedule, specific assessment, and entity details.
IFRS 9 ECL Audit Working Paper Template — free PDF
Practical audit guide covering the simplified approach provision matrix methodology, forward-looking adjustment documentation template, probability-weighted scenario framework, IFRS 7.35H movement schedule template, common ISA 540 findings on ECL estimates, and industry benchmark loss rates for 12 sectors.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
IFRS 9 Expected Credit Losses for Retail
Retail entities present a unique IFRS 9 ECL profile because the majority of their revenue is collected at the point of sale through cash, debit card, or credit card payments — meaning traditional trade receivables are relatively small compared to revenue. However, this does not eliminate the need for ECL assessment. Wholesale channel receivables (from distributors, franchisees, and corporate customers), concession receivables, loyalty programme credits, gift card breakage estimates, and receivables from online marketplace platforms all fall within the scope of IFRS 9 and require assessment under the simplified approach. The key challenge for retail auditors is identifying all receivable categories that require ECL measurement, including those that may not be immediately obvious in the financial statements.
Receivable Characteristics — Retail
Retail receivables can be categorised into several distinct streams with different credit risk profiles. Wholesale receivables from distributors and franchise partners typically carry standard commercial terms (30–60 days) and moderate credit risk. Corporate account receivables from business customers may have higher values but lower default rates due to established relationships. Concession receivables from department store or mall operators are generally low-risk but may be affected by the financial health of the host retailer. Receivables from online marketplaces and payment processors represent a growing category — these are typically settled within 7–14 days but can be affected by disputes, chargebacks, and platform insolvency. Loyalty programme credits and gift card liabilities may create receivable-like balances that require careful classification under IFRS 9 versus IFRS 15.
Forward-Looking Factors
Consumer confidence indices and retail sales data are the most relevant forward-looking indicators for retail ECL estimates. Declining consumer confidence typically precedes increased payment delays from wholesale customers and higher chargeback rates from consumer transactions. Unemployment rate forecasts are particularly important for retail entities with instalment payment plans or buy-now-pay-later arrangements. Seasonal factors are significant — ECL estimates prepared shortly after peak trading periods (Q4 for most Western markets) should consider whether the seasonal surge in receivables carries different credit risk than normalised balances.
Key forward-looking indicators for retail:
- Consumer confidence index
- Retail sales growth data
- Household disposable income
- Unemployment rate (consumer default proxy)
- E-commerce penetration trends
Regulatory and Audit Context
Audit considerations for retail ECL are relatively straightforward compared to financial institutions, but auditors should verify that all receivable categories are identified and assessed. Common findings include: omission of marketplace receivables from ECL assessment, failure to separately assess wholesale and retail channels (which have materially different risk profiles), and inadequate consideration of seasonal concentration. For retailers with significant IFRS 16 lease portfolios, the interaction between lease receivables (if applicable as lessor) and trade receivables requires careful classification.
Retail entities with franchise operations should separately assess franchisee receivables, which may carry higher credit risk than standard wholesale receivables, particularly for new or underperforming franchise locations.
Worked Example — StyleHouse Retail Group
StyleHouse Retail Group operates 45 fashion retail stores and a wholesale channel supplying 120 independent boutiques. Total trade receivables of €850K are predominantly from the wholesale channel (70%) with the remainder from corporate accounts and marketplace settlements. The neutral FL factor (1.0×) reflects stable consumer spending conditions.
| Bucket | Amount | Rate | ECL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet due | €520.000 | 0.20% | €1.040 |
| 1–30 days | €180.000 | 0.50% | €900 |
| 31–60 days | €80.000 | 1.50% | €1.200 |
| 61–90 days | €40.000 | 5.00% | €2.000 |
| 91–180 days | €20.000 | 12.00% | €2.400 |
| 180+ days | €10.000 | 35.00% | €3.500 |
| Total | €850.000 | €11.040 |
Forward-looking adjustment factor: 1× applied to all buckets. Rates shown above are adjusted rates (historical × FL factor).