IAS 36 · Insurance

Impairment Calculator
for Insurance

Calculate value in use for acquired insurance portfolios, distribution network assets, and goodwill from insurance M&A transactions. Designed for the long-tail asset profiles in mid-market insurance entities.

CGU / Asset

Identify the cash-generating unit or individual asset being tested and enter its carrying amount from the balance sheet.

Discount & terminal growth rate

The pre-tax discount rate reflects the time value of money and risks specific to the asset. The terminal growth rate is applied to cash flows beyond the explicit forecast period using the Gordon Growth Model.

Forecast cash flows

Enter projected pre-tax cash flows for each forecast year. IAS 36.33 limits explicit forecasts to five years unless a longer period can be justified.

Fair value less costs of disposal

IAS 36.18 defines recoverable amount as the higher of value in use and FVLCD. If FVLCD cannot be determined, value in use alone is used.

Export as working paper PDF

Download a formatted IAS 36 impairment test with sensitivity analysis. Enter your email to unlock. Plus one practical audit insight per week.

No spam. We're auditors, not marketers.

IAS 36.6: An asset is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount.

IAS 36.18: Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use.

IAS 36.30: Value in use reflects the present value of future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, discounted at a pre-tax rate.

Need production-ready working papers?

Built by a practicing auditor · 14-day money-back guarantee · Free updates when standards change

IAS 36 impairment testing for Insurance

Insurance entities have undergone a major reporting shift with IFRS 17's implementation, but IAS 36 remains fully relevant for non-financial assets. Goodwill from acquiring insurance books or broking businesses, customer relationship intangibles (broker networks, renewal rights), IT platforms (policy administration systems, claims management software), and office infrastructure all sit within IAS 36's scope. IFRS 17 handles the insurance contracts themselves, much as IFRS 9 handles financial instruments for banks. What's left under IAS 36 is the operational infrastructure of the insurance business. For a mid-market insurer or insurance intermediary that has grown through acquisition, goodwill and intangible assets can represent 20% to 40% of total assets.

IAS 36 testing for insurance entities requires careful separation of what IFRS 17 covers and what IAS 36 covers. The cash flows in a VIU model should reflect the entity's profit from servicing insurance contracts (the contractual service margin release, variable fee income, and investment returns on insurance float), not the insurance liabilities themselves. This is conceptually similar to banking, where the lending book's credit risk sits under IFRS 9 while the bank's infrastructure sits under IAS 36. The discount rate for an insurance CGU should reflect the specific risks of the business unit. A life insurance division with long-tail liabilities and stable premium income carries different risk from a property catastrophe reinsurer with volatile claims patterns. European mid-market insurers typically apply pre-tax WACCs between 8.5% and 12.0%. The forecast period for insurance CGUs can justifiably extend beyond five years when the business has long-duration contracts: a life insurer with a back book running off over 20 years might use a longer explicit forecast to capture the run-off profile.

Regulators have paid close attention to insurance goodwill impairment. EIOPA's peer review on supervisory practices found that several national regulators were not adequately challenging insurers' impairment testing. The PRA in the UK has noted that some insurers use discount rates that don't reflect current market conditions, instead relying on rates set at the time of acquisition. IAS 36.55 requires a current rate, not a historical one. Another common finding is that insurers performing annual goodwill tests rely on embedded value calculations that were prepared for a different purpose (regulatory solvency) and may not align with IAS 36's specific requirements. Embedded value uses different discount rates, different projection assumptions, and includes items (such as the value of future new business) that IAS 36.44 arguably excludes from VIU.

When using this calculator for insurance CGUs, input the carrying amount of operational assets and allocated goodwill. Exclude insurance contract assets and liabilities (these sit under IFRS 17). For the discount rate, use a pre-tax rate reflecting the CGU's risk. Life insurance CGUs typically sit at the lower end of the range (8.5% to 10.0%) while general insurance and reinsurance CGUs with more volatile earnings sit higher (10.0% to 12.0%). Terminal growth should reflect long-term premium growth in the entity's market. Consider extending the forecast period to seven or ten years for life insurance CGUs with long-tail business, as the five-year default may not capture the full value of in-force business running off over decades.

Frequently asked questions: Insurance

Which insurance assets fall within IAS 36's scope after IFRS 17 adoption?
All non-financial, non-insurance-contract assets. This includes goodwill, customer relationships (broker networks, renewal rights), capitalised IT systems, office property and equipment, and ROU assets. Insurance contracts and associated assets/liabilities sit under IFRS 17. Financial assets sit under IFRS 9. Everything else goes to IAS 36.
Can an insurer use its embedded value model for IAS 36 impairment testing?
Not directly. Embedded value models use post-tax discount rates, include the value of future new business, and apply different projection bases than IAS 36 requires. An insurer can start from the embedded value and adjust: remove value of new business (IAS 36 VIU reflects existing business only), convert the discount rate to pre-tax, and ensure cash flow projections exclude items prohibited by IAS 36.44. Document each adjustment clearly.
What forecast period is appropriate for a life insurance CGU?
IAS 36.33 defaults to five years but permits longer periods with justification. A life insurer with a back book of 20-year policies can justify a longer explicit forecast because the cash flow pattern is contractually defined and historically predictable. Seven to ten years is common in practice, with a terminal value capturing the remaining tail. The entity must demonstrate its ability to forecast accurately over the chosen period.
How should an insurance intermediary test goodwill from acquiring a broking business?
Allocate goodwill to the acquired broking CGU per IAS 36.80. Build a VIU model based on projected commission and fee income from the existing client book, applying a retention rate assumption. The discount rate should reflect the intermediary's specific risk (client concentration, regulatory risk, competition from direct channels). A broker with 90% client retention and diversified lines carries lower risk than one with 70% retention concentrated in one product line.

Related industry calculators

General Calculator