IFRS 10 · Not-for-Profit

Intercompany Eliminations
for Not-for-Profit

Not-for-profit groups consolidate trading subsidiaries, charitable entities, and shared service operations with unique intercompany flows. This tool matches intragroup grants, service charges, and fund transfers to generate elimination journals for your group accounts.

Group entities

Identify the parent and subsidiary involved in the intercompany transactions. Ownership percentage is used for NCI calculations.

Intercompany transactions

Toggle each transaction type to include it. Only active sections generate elimination entries.

A. Trading eliminations
Eliminate intercompany revenue and cost of sales
B. Unrealised profit in inventory
Eliminate profit on goods still held at year-end
C. Intercompany loan
Eliminate loan receivable/payable and interest
D. Dividend elimination
Eliminate dividend income received from subsidiary
E. Intercompany balance elimination
Eliminate trade receivables and payables between entities

Export as working paper PDF

Download formatted consolidation elimination entries. Enter your email to unlock. Plus one practical audit insight per week.

No spam. We're auditors, not marketers.

IFRS 10.B86(c): Intragroup balances, transactions, income and expenses shall be eliminated in full.

IFRS 10.B86(d): Intragroup losses may indicate an impairment that requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

Need production-ready working papers?

Built by a practicing auditor · 14-day money-back guarantee · Free updates when standards change

IFRS 10 intercompany eliminations for Not-for-Profit

Not-for-profit groups present a distinct consolidation challenge because the parent entity is often a charity or foundation, while the subsidiaries may include trading companies, fundraising vehicles, and service delivery entities. Control is established not through equity ownership (the charity may own the trading subsidiary's shares at nominal value) but through the charity's power to govern the subsidiary's financial and operating policies. IFRS 10.6-7 defines control through power over the investee, exposure to variable returns, and the ability to use power to affect those returns. For not-for-profit groups, "variable returns" includes non-financial returns such as the furtherance of the charity's objects. The elimination requirements under IFRS 10.B86 apply in full, even though the parent holds no meaningful equity investment to eliminate against subsidiary net assets.

Intercompany transactions in not-for-profit groups typically include intragroup grants and donations (the parent charity may donate funds to a subsidiary charity for a specific project), management charges from the parent to trading subsidiaries for use of the charity's name, brand, and support functions, gift aid payments from the trading subsidiary to the parent charity (in jurisdictions like the UK where this mechanism exists), and cost recharges for shared premises, staff, and administration. The investment-versus-equity elimination at consolidation is unusual because the parent's "investment" in the subsidiary is often nominal (£1 or €1 for the shares). The consolidation still requires eliminating the parent's cost of investment against the parent's share of the subsidiary's net assets at acquisition, with any difference recognised as goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase under IFRS 3 (though goodwill on acquiring a not-for-profit subsidiary is rare and raises questions about impairment testing if it arises).

Charity regulators have raised concerns about group audit quality in the sector. The Charity Commission for England and Wales has noted in its regulatory guidance (CC51) that charity groups sometimes fail to prepare consolidated accounts when required, or prepare them without proper elimination of intragroup transactions. A specific issue arises with gift aid payments: a UK trading subsidiary may accrue gift aid payable to the parent charity at year end, but if the gift aid deed isn't executed within the required timeframe, the tax benefit is lost and the intercompany balance may not be valid. Auditors must verify that the gift aid accrual meets the conditions for recognition under applicable tax legislation, not just that it nets off in the consolidation.

Map all intragroup arrangements between the charity parent and its subsidiaries. Pay particular attention to grants with conditions attached (restricted funding passed from the parent to a subsidiary for a specific purpose), as the timing of recognition may differ between the entities. For management charges, verify the basis of calculation and confirm that both entities recorded the same amount. For gift aid (UK groups), confirm the deed was executed within nine months of the subsidiary's year end per CTA 2010 s.191. Process all eliminations at the consolidation level, remembering that the investment elimination will look different from a commercial group because the parent's cost of investment is nominal.

Frequently asked questions: Not-for-Profit

- Q: How do I eliminate the parent charity's investment in a trading subsidiary when the investment cost is only £1?
You still perform the standard elimination under IFRS 3 and IFRS 10. Eliminate the parent's £1 investment against its share of the subsidiary's net assets at the date control was established. If the subsidiary has accumulated reserves, the difference between the £1 cost and the share of net assets is a gain on bargain purchase recognised in the consolidated income statement (or, depending on your framework, directly in reserves). In practice, most not-for-profit groups established these subsidiaries at incorporation when net assets were also nominal, so the difference is often immaterial.
Do I need to eliminate intragroup grants between charity entities in the group?
Yes. If the parent charity grants funds to a subsidiary charity, eliminate the grant expense in the parent against the grant income in the subsidiary. If the grant has performance conditions and the subsidiary hasn't yet met them (recognising deferred income), ensure the parent has recognised the grant expense on the same basis. Mismatched recognition between grant-maker and grant-recipient is a common source of intercompany discrepancies in charity groups.
How should I handle restricted funds that flow between entities in a charity group?
Restricted funds that the parent passes to a subsidiary retain their restrictions in the consolidated accounts. The intercompany transfer eliminates, but the consolidated fund note must still show the restriction. This means the elimination doesn't just net off income and expense; it also requires careful presentation in the consolidated statement of financial activities (or equivalent) to ensure restricted, unrestricted, and designated fund classifications are maintained correctly.
What about volunteer services provided between group entities?
If volunteer services aren't recognised in the financial statements of either entity (which is the normal position under most charity GAAP frameworks, since volunteer services rarely meet recognition criteria), there's nothing to eliminate. Only recognised transactions and balances require elimination under IFRS 10.B86. If the group has chosen to recognise volunteer services at fair value (rare, but permitted in some frameworks), then the intercompany element of those recognised services would need elimination.

Related industry guides

General Tool

All industry guides

Manufacturing Retail Technology Banking & Finance Healthcare Real Estate Insurance Energy & Utilities Agriculture Construction Logistics Professional Services
IAS 36 Impairment Calculator IAS 12 Deferred Tax Calculator Analytical Review Tool

Further reading