The summary of uncorrected misstatements (SUM) lands on the partner’s desk the morning before clearance. That’s when the real ISA 450 work starts. You’ve found six misstatements during fieldwork. None of them individually exceeds overall materiality (OM). Management corrected two but declined to adjust the other four, calling them “immaterial.” The aggregate of those four sits at 78% of OM. You haven’t finished testing yet.
In our experience, this is the conversation where junior staff learn what materiality actually means. It’s also the most uncomfortable meeting of the audit. The file should tell a story, and the SUM is where that story either holds together or falls apart. ISA 450 requires you to accumulate all misstatements other than those that are clearly trivial, communicate them to management, request correction, and evaluate whether uncorrected misstatements are material individually or in aggregate before forming the opinion.
Key takeaways
- ISA 450 requires you to accumulate all misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial. That includes misstatements in amounts, classifications, presentations, and disclosures.
- Misstatements split into factual (no doubt about the error), judgmental (differences in estimates or policy application), or projected (your best estimate in a population based on sampling results).
- “Clearly trivial” (CTT) is not another expression for “not material.” It is a wholly different, smaller order of magnitude. In practice, CTT is typically set at 3–5% of OM.
- You must communicate all accumulated misstatements to management on a timely basis and request correction. If management refuses to correct, you need to understand the reasons and consider whether their judgment indicates possible bias.
- Before forming the opinion, you reassess materiality under ISA 320. Then you evaluate whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in aggregate, considering both size and nature.
- Uncorrected misstatements and their effect on the opinion must be communicated to those charged with governance (TCWG) under ISA 260. You also obtain a written representation that management considers the effects of uncorrected misstatements to be immaterial.
- What is ISA 450?
- Types of misstatements
- Accumulating misstatements
- Considering misstatements as the audit progresses
- Communication and correction
- Evaluating uncorrected misstatements
- Communication with those charged with governance
- Written representation
- Documentation
- ISA 450 in your jurisdiction
- Frequently asked questions
What is ISA 450?
ISA 450, titled “Evaluation of Misstatements Identified During the Audit,” governs what happens after you find errors. Every audit finds misstatements. The question is what to do with them. ISA 450 gives you the framework for accumulating, communicating, evaluating, and ultimately deciding whether uncorrected misstatements require a modified opinion.
The standard is the companion to ISA 320 (Materiality). ISA 320 sets the threshold. ISA 450 evaluates findings against it. Together they translate audit evidence into the opinion on the financial statements.
Types of misstatements
ISA 450.A1 identifies the sources, and ISA 450.A3 distinguishes three categories that are useful for evaluation and communication:
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Factual misstatements | Misstatements about which there is no doubt — clear errors in data, omissions, or breaches of reporting standards | An invoice recorded at the wrong amount; a required disclosure omitted entirely; depreciation calculated using the wrong rate |
| Judgmental misstatements | Differences arising from management’s judgments that the auditor considers unreasonable — in accounting estimates or policy application | An allowance for doubtful debts that falls outside the auditor’s reasonable range; a provision measured using assumptions the auditor considers inappropriate |
| Projected misstatements | The auditor’s best estimate of misstatements in a population, projected from misstatements found in a sample | Sampling of 50 invoices reveals a 2% overstatement error rate; projected to the full population, the estimated misstatement is €45,000 |
This categorisation is not required by the standard but is recommended as a practical tool for communication with management and those charged with governance.
Accumulating misstatements
ISA 450.5 requires the auditor to accumulate all misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial.
The “clearly trivial” threshold
ISA 450.A2 is where most files get this wrong. “Clearly trivial” (CTT) is not another expression for “not material.” Matters that are clearly trivial are of a wholly different (smaller) order of magnitude than materiality. They are matters that are clearly inconsequential whether taken individually or in aggregate, and whether judged by any criteria of size, nature, or circumstances.
When there is any uncertainty about whether something is clearly trivial, it is not clearly trivial and must be accumulated. In our experience, this is the rule seniors skip first when the clearance clock is ticking. “Appears reasonable. Waive further pursuit.” That’s the ironic sign-off, and it’s usually how items below the CTT get quietly dropped even when there’s real uncertainty.
At firms like ours, CTT usually sits at 3–5% of OM (sometimes up to 10%), though the figure varies by firm methodology. The threshold must be documented. The ISA 450 misstatement tracker accumulates factual, judgmental, and projected misstatements and evaluates them against these thresholds automatically.
Nature matters, not just amount
A misstatement of €500 in a company with overall materiality of €100,000 might be clearly trivial by amount, but not if it involves a related party transaction, executive compensation, or a potential fraud indicator. Always consider whether the nature or circumstances of a misstatement make it significant regardless of its monetary size. A systematic error in a control that produces small individual misstatements but indicates a pervasive control failure is never clearly trivial.
Considering misstatements as the audit progresses
ISA 450.6–7 requires you to consider, during the audit, whether the nature and circumstances of identified misstatements indicate that other misstatements may exist that, when taken together with accumulated misstatements, could be material.
If the aggregate of misstatements accumulated during the audit approaches materiality, you need to consider whether additional audit procedures are needed. This is the early warning system. If you’re finding significant misstatements in early fieldwork, the risk assessment may need revision and the planned procedures may be insufficient.
If the nature of identified misstatements suggests systemic issues (a breakdown in a control, an incorrect application of an accounting policy across all transactions), determine whether the audit strategy and plan need to be revised.
Communication and correction
Communication with management
ISA 450.8 requires the auditor to communicate all accumulated misstatements to the appropriate level of management on a timely basis, and to request that management correct those misstatements.
“Appropriate level” means the level that has responsibility and authority to evaluate the misstatements and take corrective action. For routine errors, this may be the finance director or controller. For judgmental misstatements involving significant estimates, this may be the CFO or CEO.
Why timeliness matters
Timely communication gives management the opportunity to correct misstatements before the financial statements are finalised. It also allows the auditor to observe management’s attitude toward corrections. A management team that consistently refuses to correct errors, even when it would be straightforward to do so, may be exhibiting a pattern of bias that the auditor should consider under ISA 240 (Fraud).
If management corrects the misstatements
Corrected misstatements are removed from the summary of uncorrected misstatements. However, the auditor should consider whether the corrected misstatement indicates a control deficiency that should be communicated under ISA 265.
If management refuses to correct
The auditor must understand management’s reasons. The reasons are relevant to the overall evaluation of management’s judgment and to the auditor’s consideration of potential management bias.
Evaluating uncorrected misstatements
Reassess materiality first
ISA 450.10 requires you, before evaluating uncorrected misstatements, to reassess the materiality determined under ISA 320. Since OM at planning was often based on estimates (budgeted profit, for example), you need to confirm whether the materiality level remains appropriate based on actual results. This step is where the file either holds together or falls apart. If the OM you used to plan is no longer the OM you apply to the SUM, and you don’t say so, the reviewer sees a gap.
The evaluation
ISA 450.11 requires you to determine whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in aggregate. Four angles matter.
Size. Does the aggregate of uncorrected misstatements exceed materiality? If the aggregate approaches but does not exceed materiality, consider the risk that undetected misstatements (which always exist due to sampling and other limitations) could push the total above materiality.
Nature. Some misstatements may be material due to their qualitative characteristics regardless of amount. A misstatement that affects a loan covenant, reverses the direction of a trend, converts a profit to a loss, affects related party disclosures, or relates to management compensation may be material at amounts below quantitative materiality.
Circumstances. The particular context of each misstatement, including its effect on key ratios, compliance with regulatory requirements, and the impact on users’ decision-making.
Prior-period uncorrected misstatements. You also consider whether uncorrected misstatements from prior periods affect the current period’s financial statements. Opening balances carry forward, and prior-period misstatements that “reverse” in the current period still matter because both periods may be misstated.
Can misstatements offset each other?
ISA 450.A14 addresses this: if an individual misstatement is judged to be material, it is unlikely that it can be offset by other misstatements. Even if revenue is overstated by €50,000 and expenses are overstated by €50,000 (resulting in zero net effect on profit), both the revenue and expense lines are misstated, and users who rely on those individual figures are misled. Offsetting of immaterial misstatements within the same account balance may be appropriate, but only after considering whether further undetected misstatements might exist.
Communication with those charged with governance
ISA 450.12–13 requires the auditor to communicate to those charged with governance:
- Uncorrected misstatements and the effect they may have, individually or in aggregate, on the opinion in the auditor’s report. The communication must identify material uncorrected misstatements individually.
- The effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods on the relevant classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures, and on the financial statements as a whole.
The auditor must also request that those charged with governance correct the uncorrected misstatements.
Written representation
ISA 450.14 requires the auditor to obtain a written representation from management (and, where appropriate, those charged with governance) that they believe the effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial, individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements as a whole. A summary of the uncorrected misstatements must be included in or attached to the written representation.
This representation serves two purposes: it formally records management’s acknowledgment of the uncorrected misstatements, and it provides the auditor with evidence that management has evaluated the effect and concluded it is immaterial. If management will not provide this representation, the auditor must consider the implications under ISA 580.
Documentation
ISA 450.15 requires documentation of three things: the CTT amount (below which misstatements are not accumulated), all misstatements accumulated during the audit and whether they have been corrected, and your conclusion as to whether uncorrected misstatements are material (individually or in aggregate) with the basis for that conclusion.
The SUM is where the reviewer sees whether the file actually hangs together. A list of numbers without the basis for the conclusion is not documentation. It’s a log.
ISA 450 in your jurisdiction
Netherlands. COS 450 follows ISA 450 closely. AFM inspections regularly examine the summary of uncorrected misstatements and evaluate whether the auditor’s conclusion on materiality is well-supported. The AFM has noted deficiencies where auditors fail to consider the qualitative aspects of misstatements, or where the aggregate of uncorrected misstatements approaches materiality without the auditor performing additional procedures.
Germany. IDW PS 450 adapts ISA 450. The Prüfungsbericht requires disclosure of identified misstatements and their evaluation, making the German documentation requirements particularly rigorous. The WPK’s inspections focus on whether the evaluation of misstatements is consistent with the materiality levels documented under ISA 320.
United Kingdom. ISA (UK) 450 is substantively aligned with ISA 450. The FRC’s inspections have identified cases where auditors do not sufficiently challenge management’s reasons for declining to correct misstatements, and where the evaluation of aggregate misstatements approaching materiality is insufficiently rigorous.
France. NEP 450 implements ISA 450 within the French statutory framework. French practice requires the commissaire aux comptes to present a summary of proposed adjustments (ajustements proposés) and uncorrected misstatements (anomalies non corrigées) in the lettre de direction, which is a key deliverable of the audit process.
Frequently asked questions
What happens if uncorrected misstatements exceed materiality?
If the auditor concludes that uncorrected misstatements, individually or in aggregate, are material, the auditor must either obtain correction from management or modify the audit opinion under ISA 705. A qualified opinion is issued if the misstatement is material but not pervasive; an adverse opinion is issued if it is material and pervasive.
Must the auditor report misstatements below the clearly trivial threshold?
No. Misstatements below the clearly trivial threshold need not be accumulated or communicated. However, the threshold must be set at a level that is a wholly different order of magnitude from materiality, and any uncertainty about whether an item is clearly trivial means it must be accumulated.
How do projected misstatements work in the evaluation?
Projected misstatements are the auditor’s best estimate of the total misstatement in a population based on errors found in a sample. They are included in the summary of accumulated misstatements at their projected amount (not just the amount actually found in the sample). The auditor should also consider whether the projection indicates a systematic error requiring investigation.
Does the auditor need to consider prior-year uncorrected misstatements?
Yes. The auditor must consider the effect of prior-period uncorrected misstatements on the current period’s financial statements. Some prior-year misstatements may reverse in the current year (e.g., an accrual that was understated last year increases this year’s expense), while others may persist in the balance sheet.
Further reading and source references
- IAASB Handbook 2024: ISA 450 full text: The authoritative source including all application material.
- ISA 320: Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit: the companion standard for determining materiality.
- ISA 260 (Revised): Communication with Those Charged with Governance: governs communication of misstatements to governance.
- ISA 580: Written Representations: the requirement for management’s representation on uncorrected misstatements.
- ISA 705 (Revised): Modifications to the Opinion: governs the effect of material misstatements on the auditor’s report.
This guide reflects the ISA 450 text as published in the IAASB 2024 Handbook. National implementations may include additional requirements. Always consult the applicable national standard alongside the international text. This content is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal or professional advice.
Production-ready audit templates
Related ciferi content
Related guides:
Put audit concepts into practice with these free tools: