OECD TP Guidelines · Real Estate

Transfer Pricing Tool
for Real Estate

Pre-configured for intercompany property management fees, development services, and rental arrangements between related parties. Cost Plus is the typical method for management services.

Method
Details
Comparables
Results

Select Transfer Pricing Method

Choose the method that best matches your transaction type and available data.

Transfer Pricing for Real Estate: OECD Methodology

Transfer pricing for real estate groups centres on three main transaction types: property management fees, development services, and intercompany rental arrangements. Real estate is fundamentally an asset-intensive business where the value lies in the property portfolio itself — but the management and services that support the portfolio are often provided by related-party entities within the group, creating transfer pricing obligations under OECD Guidelines and local tax laws.

For property management services — including leasing, tenant management, maintenance coordination, and financial administration — the Cost Plus method is standard. The management company's cost base (personnel, overhead, direct costs) is marked up to reflect an arm's length return for the services provided. Typical markups for routine property management services range from 5% to 15%, depending on the complexity of the portfolio, the number of properties managed, and the level of decision-making authority retained by the management company versus the property-owning entities. Where the management company performs more strategic functions (asset allocation, investment decisions, development oversight), higher markups or TNMM may be more appropriate.

For intercompany rental arrangements, the CUP method is preferred where comparable market rental data is available — and in most mature real estate markets, rental comparables are abundant. Tax authorities can readily verify intercompany rents against market rates using publicly available databases, broker reports, and local property registers. This makes real estate one of the few sectors where CUP is frequently the best method for a major transaction category. REIT structures with intercompany management add additional complexity: the management fee structure must comply with both REIT regulatory requirements and transfer pricing rules simultaneously.

Recommended Method: Cost Plus Method

For real estate entities, the cost plus method is typically the most appropriate transfer pricing method. This tool pre-selects this method based on industry best practice and OECD guidance. Typical arm's length ranges for real estate are 5–15%.

Typical Real Estate Intercompany Transactions

Property management fees — A management company within the group provides property management services (leasing, maintenance, tenant relations) to related-party property-owning entities. Cost Plus is standard for routine management. Preferred method: Cost Plus Method.

Development services — Related-party development company provides project management, construction oversight, and development services. Cost Plus markup benchmarked against independent developers. Preferred method: Cost Plus Method.

Intercompany rental arrangements — One group entity leases property from a related-party property owner. CUP applies where comparable market rental rates are available for similar properties in the same location. Preferred method: CUP (Comparable Uncontrolled Price).

Regulatory Context

Real estate TP is relatively straightforward due to market rental data availability. Key risk: management fees that extract excessive profit from property SPVs. Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Ireland — common holding jurisdictions for real estate structures — have specific substance requirements.

Limitation: This tool supports Cost Plus for management fees and CUP for rental benchmarking. For joint venture profit allocation or complex development profit sharing, consult a transfer pricing specialist.

Worked Example: Property Management Fee — Cost Plus Method

Scenario: A Dutch property group's management company (PropManage B.V.) provides management services to 12 property-owning SPVs within the group. The management company charges a fee based on cost plus markup. We benchmark the markup against 9 comparable independent property management companies.

Comparable set (9 comparables): 5.2, 6.8, 7.5, 8.3, 9.1, 10.4, 11.2, 12.8, 14.5

Result: The tested party's cost plus markup of 10.0% falls within the interquartile range (Q1: 7.0% – Q3: 12.4%). No adjustment is required.

Frequently Asked Questions — Real Estate Transfer Pricing

What transfer pricing method is used for property management fees?
Cost Plus is the standard method. The property management company's costs (staff, overhead, direct expenses) are marked up to reflect an arm's length return. Typical markups range from 5–15%. For more strategic management functions (asset allocation, investment decisions), TNMM may be more appropriate.
How do I benchmark intercompany rental rates?
Use the CUP method. Compare the intercompany rent against market rental rates for comparable properties in the same location, of similar size, condition, and specification. Real estate databases, broker reports, and public property registers provide extensive comparable data. Adjustments may be needed for tenant improvements, lease terms, and break options.
What are the TP considerations for REIT structures?
REITs with intercompany management must price management fees at arm's length while also complying with REIT regulatory requirements (e.g., distribution obligations, activity tests). The management fee structure affects both taxable income and distributable profit. Many jurisdictions have specific REIT transfer pricing guidance.
How do development services fees work in real estate TP?
Development management services (project management, construction oversight, planning coordination) are typically priced using Cost Plus. The markup depends on the complexity and risk of the development — routine project management at 5–10%, complex development including planning risk at 10–20%. If the development company bears significant entrepreneurial risk, TNMM may be more appropriate.
Are fair value adjustments on investment property relevant to TP?
Fair value changes under IAS 40 affect the profitability of property-owning entities but should generally be excluded from PLI calculations in TNMM benchmarking, as they reflect market movements rather than operational performance. Ensure your PLI uses operating profit before fair value adjustments.

Related Industry Tools

← All Industries ConstructionBankingHospitalityGovernment

All Industry Variants

ManufacturingRetailBankingInsuranceHealthcareTechnologyEnergyConstructionNonprofitsGovernmentTransportationHospitalityAgriculture
Financial Ratio Calculator Materiality Calculator