Select Transfer Pricing Method
Choose the method that best matches your transaction type and available data.
Transfer Pricing for Nonprofits: OECD Methodology
Transfer pricing rules generally have limited application to nonprofit organisations, but the extent of exemption varies significantly by jurisdiction. International nonprofits, NGOs, and charities with operations in multiple countries should understand when TP documentation requirements apply and when exemptions are available. In many OECD jurisdictions, entities that are exempt from corporate income tax are also exempt from transfer pricing documentation requirements — but this exemption is not universal, and some jurisdictions apply TP rules to all entities regardless of tax-exempt status.
Where transfer pricing rules do apply to nonprofit intercompany transactions, the Cost Plus method at cost or with a modest markup (0–5%) is standard. Nonprofit shared services — including finance, HR, IT, communications, and programme management — are typically provided by the international head office to country or regional offices. Because the objective is cost recovery rather than profit maximisation, the arm's length markup is at the lower end of the range. OECD Guidelines recognise that independent parties performing similar services may accept zero or minimal markup where the service is incidental to a broader charitable relationship (analogous to low-value-adding services under OECD ¶7.45–7.65).
The key question for nonprofit TP is scope: does the entity engage in any commercial activities that generate taxable income? If a nonprofit earns revenue from commercial activities (consultancy, publications, training, rental income), the related-party transactions connected to those commercial activities may fall within scope of TP rules even if the entity's charitable activities are exempt. International development organisations, educational institutions, and healthcare charities with mixed activities should assess their TP exposure carefully. This tool provides the statistical analysis for organisations where TP documentation is required — consult a tax advisor to determine whether your nonprofit falls within scope.
Recommended Method: Cost Plus Method
For nonprofits entities, the cost plus method is typically the most appropriate transfer pricing method. This tool pre-selects this method based on industry best practice and OECD guidance. Typical arm's length ranges for nonprofits are 0–5%.
Typical Nonprofits Intercompany Transactions
Shared administrative services — International head office provides finance, HR, IT, and governance services to country offices. Typically charged at cost or cost plus a modest markup (0–5%). Preferred method: Cost Plus Method.
Grant administration fees — Regional or country office administers grants on behalf of the parent entity. Administration fee typically covers direct costs plus reasonable overhead allocation. Preferred method: Cost Plus Method.
Programme support charges — Head office charges for programmatic support, technical assistance, and quality assurance. Often structured as a percentage of programme expenditure. Preferred method: Cost Plus Method.
Regulatory Context
Nonprofit TP exposure is generally limited but varies by jurisdiction. Key risk areas: commercial activities within a nonprofit, excessive management fees reducing taxable income in operating countries, and cross-border grant flows to countries with aggressive TP enforcement.
Limitation: This tool provides statistical analysis for organisations where TP documentation is required. Many nonprofits may not need TP documentation at all — consult a tax advisor to determine scope.
Worked Example: NGO Shared Services — Cost Plus Method
Scenario: An international NGO headquartered in Geneva provides finance, HR, and IT services to its country offices in 15 countries. The head office charges a management fee based on cost plus 3% markup. We benchmark against 6 comparable independent management service providers working with nonprofit clients.
Comparable set (6 comparables): 0, 1.5, 2.8, 3.5, 4.2, 5
Result: The markup of 3.0% falls within the interquartile range (Q1: 1.8% – Q3: 4.4%). No adjustment is required.