IAS 37 · Retail

IAS 37 Provision Calculator
for Retail

Pre-configured for retail provision types: customer return and refund provisions, store closure restructuring costs, lease make-good obligations, loyalty programme analysis, and product recall provisions.

Obligation Type

Present Obligation

Does a present obligation exist from a past event?

IAS 37 Provision Assessment Toolkit — free PDF

Complete audit toolkit: IAS 37 recognition decision flowchart, measurement methodology guide, discounting worked examples, disclosure checklist, provision type cheat sheet, and journal entry templates.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

IAS 37.14 — A provision shall be recognised when: (a) an entity has a present obligation from a past event; (b) it is probable that an outflow will be required; (c) a reliable estimate can be made.

IAS 37.36 — The amount recognised shall be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.

IAS 37.39 — Where there is a large population of items, the obligation is estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities (expected value).

IAS 37.45 — Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision shall be the present value of the expenditures expected to settle the obligation.

IAS 37.72 — A constructive obligation to restructure arises only when an entity has a detailed formal plan and has raised a valid expectation in those affected.

Scope Note: Gift card breakage is revenue recognition under IFRS 15, not an IAS 37 provision. Loyalty programme obligations are contract liabilities under IFRS 15.B39-B40, not IAS 37 provisions.

IAS 37 Provisions in Retail

Retail entities present a distinctive IAS 37 provision profile driven by high transaction volumes, extensive store networks, and direct consumer relationships. The most common provision type — customer returns and refunds — sits at the intersection of IAS 37 and IFRS 15. Under IFRS 15.B20-B27, a retailer recognises a refund liability (similar to a provision) and a corresponding return asset for the right to recover products from customers. While technically under IFRS 15 rather than IAS 37, the estimation methodology is identical: the expected value method applied to historical return rates. Store closure restructuring provisions are the second most significant category, arising when retailers rationalise underperforming locations. These programmes trigger multiple provision components: employee termination payments, lease exit costs, and make-good obligations for leased premises. Lease reinstatement provisions deserve particular attention because they are recognised at the point of modifying the premises, not at lease end, and must be discounted to present value when the remaining lease term is significant.

Measurement Considerations for Retail

Customer return provisions in retail require the expected value method because they involve large populations of transactions with predictable return patterns. Historical return rates segmented by product category, season, and sales channel provide the basis for estimation. Online sales typically show return rates 2-4 times higher than in-store purchases, making channel segmentation essential. The provision should be measured net of the return asset — the expected recovery value of returned products. Seasonal spikes (post-Christmas returns, post-Black Friday returns) create temporary increases in the provision that should be reflected in interim financial statements. Gift card breakage — the portion of gift cards expected never to be redeemed — is recognised as revenue under IFRS 15, not as a provision reversal. Loyalty programme obligations may superficially resemble provisions but are typically contract liabilities under IFRS 15.B39-B40 representing deferred revenue allocated to the loyalty points performance obligation.

Regulatory Context and Audit Considerations

Retail restructuring provisions are subject to particularly rigorous scrutiny under IAS 37.70-83 because store closure programmes are highly visible public events. The requirement that a valid expectation must be raised in those affected means that announcing a closure programme to employees and customers creates the constructive obligation — the board decision alone does not suffice. Auditors should verify that the restructuring provision includes only direct expenditures necessarily entailed by the restructuring: severance payments, lease termination penalties, and asset write-downs. Costs of ongoing activities — retraining staff redeployed to other stores, marketing to redirect customers to remaining locations, and investment in online platforms — cannot be included even if they are incurred as a consequence of the restructuring decision.

Common Provision Types in Retail

refund return

Customer return and refund obligations — cross-reference IFRS 15.B20-B27 for return asset recognition alongside the refund liability

Typical: 3-15% of revenue (return rate dependent) Timeline: 30-90 days Method: Expected Value
restructuring

Store closure programmes including lease exit costs, employee termination payments, and make-good obligations for leased premises

Typical: Varies by programme scope Timeline: 6-18 months Method: Best Estimate
lease reinstatement

Obligation to restore leased retail premises to original condition at lease end — strip-out of fit-outs, fixtures, and modifications

Typical: €20K-€500K per location Timeline: Remaining lease term Method: Best Estimate
warranty

Product warranty provisions for own-brand goods — manufacturer warranty pass-through for third-party brands

Typical: 0.5-2% of own-brand revenue Timeline: 1-2 years Method: Expected Value
regulatory penalty

Product safety recalls, consumer protection penalties, data privacy fines (GDPR)

Typical: Variable Timeline: 1-3 years Method: Best Estimate

Worked Example: NordStyle Retail Group

NordStyle operates 85 fashion retail stores and an online shop. Management is closing 12 underperforming stores. For each store, the following costs are estimated:

Outcome Probability Amount
Employee severance (avg 8 staff per store) 100% €35.000
Lease exit penalty (avg remaining term 2.5 years) 100% €62.000
Make-good / reinstatement per store 100% €28.000

Per-store restructuring cost = €35,000 + €62,000 + €28,000 = €125,000. Total provision for 12 stores = €1,500,000. This assumes a detailed formal plan exists, has been approved by the board, and the main features have been communicated to affected employees and communicated to landlords. The provision excludes retraining costs for staff redeployed to remaining stores and marketing costs to redirect customers.

Provision Amount
€1.500.000
Regulatory Context: EU Consumer Rights Directive and national consumer protection laws create statutory return rights (typically 14 days for online purchases) that represent legal obligations for retailers. GDPR data breach penalties can create provision obligations for retailers handling large volumes of customer data.

Frequently Asked Questions — Retail

Are customer return provisions under IAS 37 or IFRS 15 for retail?
Customer return provisions for retail are technically under IFRS 15 (specifically B20-B27), not IAS 37. IFRS 15 requires recognition of a refund liability (measured at the amount of consideration expected to be refunded) and a return asset (measured at the cost of returned goods less expected recovery costs). However, the estimation methodology is identical to IAS 37's expected value method, and many retailers present the refund liability alongside other provisions on the balance sheet. The key difference is the offsetting return asset, which has no equivalent in IAS 37.
When should a retail store closure be recognised as a restructuring provision?
A store closure creates a provision only when IAS 37.72's dual criteria are met: (1) a detailed formal plan identifying affected stores, employee numbers, costs, and timeline exists, and (2) the main features have been communicated to those affected, raising a valid expectation. Making the public announcement or beginning implementation triggers the obligation. Board approval alone is insufficient. The provision covers only directly arising costs: severance, lease penalties, and make-good obligations — not retraining, marketing, or investment in alternative channels.
How should lease reinstatement provisions be measured for retail premises?
Lease reinstatement (make-good) provisions should be measured at the best estimate of the cost to restore the premises to the condition required by the lease agreement. This is typically the cost of stripping out tenant fit-outs, fixtures, and signage. The provision is recognised when the obligation arises — usually when the retailer modifies the premises — not at lease end. If the remaining lease term exceeds one year, the provision should be discounted to present value. Changes in estimate are applied prospectively.
Are loyalty programme obligations provisions under IAS 37 for retailers?
No. Loyalty programme obligations are typically contract liabilities under IFRS 15, not provisions under IAS 37. IFRS 15.B39-B40 requires retailers to allocate a portion of the transaction price to the loyalty points as a separate performance obligation, creating deferred revenue. Revenue is recognised when points are redeemed or expire. This is fundamentally different from an IAS 37 provision because the amount represents deferred consideration, not a present obligation from a past event. However, if the loyalty programme involves a legal obligation to a third party, there may be an IAS 37 component.
How should product recall provisions be estimated for retailers selling own-brand products?
Product recall provisions should include the estimated costs of withdrawing affected products from sale, notifying customers, providing refunds or replacements, logistics costs for returns, disposal of recalled products, and any regulatory fines. Use the expected value method if the recall affects a large population, weighting the possible cost outcomes by probability. For retailers selling third-party branded products, assess whether a reimbursement from the manufacturer meets the virtually certain threshold (IAS 37.53) for separate asset recognition.