Non-Adjusting Events After the Reporting Period

What are non-adjusting events?

IAS 10.10 draws the line: non-adjusting events arise from conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date. The amounts in the financial statements stay as they are. IAS 10.21 then requires disclosure of the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect (or a statement that the estimate cannot be made). The disclosure obligation applies only when the event is material.

IAS 10.11 gives examples: a major business combination after the reporting period, a decline in market value of investments between year end and the date the financial statements are authorised, and the destruction of a production plant by fire after the reporting period when no pre-existing condition caused the fire. Each of these reflects a new condition, not confirmation of something that existed at 31 December.

The auditor's role under ISA 560.8 is to evaluate whether management has correctly classified these events and, where disclosure is required, whether the disclosure is adequate. The practical difficulty is that classification is rarely clean. A customer bankruptcy in January could be adjusting (if the customer's financial distress existed at year end) or non-adjusting (if the bankruptcy resulted from a sudden event in January). The auditor must document which category applies and why.

Why it matters in practice

Consider an engineering group that exports precision components to EU customers. In January, the EU announces new tariffs affecting imports from non-EU competitors, effective April. The tariffs do not apply to the entity directly, but they increase the competitor's landed cost by approximately 15%, which management expects will shift orders back. The tariff announcement occurred after year end with no evidence that the policy existed or was probable at 31 December. This is a non-adjusting event. If the estimated revenue impact is material (say 6-9% of current revenue), IAS 10.21 requires disclosure of the nature and estimated financial effect.

Teams frequently disclose non-adjusting events without including the estimated financial effect required by IAS 10.21(b). A disclosure that describes the event but omits the financial impact — or the explicit statement that one cannot be estimated — is incomplete and does not meet the standard.

The IAS 10.14 going concern override is equally important and frequently missed. When a bank notifies the entity in February that it will not renew a critical credit facility maturing in the near term, the event itself is non-adjusting (the bank's decision was taken after year end). But teams stop at the classification and disclosure step without evaluating whether the going concern basis of accounting is still appropriate. IAS 10.14-16 require a separate assessment, and the conclusion must be documented. A single post-year-end event can force a complete change in the basis of preparation.

Key standard references

• IAS 10.3(b): Definition of non-adjusting events — events indicative of conditions that arose after the end of the reporting period.
• IAS 10.10: Non-adjusting events do not result in adjustment of the financial statement amounts.
• IAS 10.21: Disclosure requirements — the entity must disclose the nature of the event and an estimate of financial effect, or state that an estimate cannot be made.
• IAS 10.14–16: Going concern override — if a non-adjusting event indicates the going concern assumption is no longer appropriate, the basis of preparation must change.
• ISA 560.8: The auditor's obligation to evaluate classification and disclosure of non-adjusting events.

Related terms

Related reading

Frequently asked questions