How to Audit Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities Under IFRS 12

Why IFRS 12 generates more disclosure findings than any comparable standard

IFRS 12 was issued in 2011 to consolidate the disclosure requirements previously scattered across IAS 27, IAS 28, IAS 31, and SIC-12. The consolidation made the total volume of requirements visible for the first time, and that volume is substantial. A client with subsidiaries, an associate, and a joint arrangement can easily require eight to twelve pages of IFRS 12 disclosures. Most mid-market clients produce two.

The gap exists because IFRS 12 has no materiality shortcut for most of its requirements. IFRS 12.3 states that the standard applies to entities with interests in subsidiaries, associates, joint arrangements, or unconsolidated structured entities. Unlike IFRS 7 (which allows grouping and summarising of financial instrument disclosures when individual detail is not material), IFRS 12 requires specific disclosures for each category of interest, and several requirements apply per individual investee. The summarised financial information requirement for material associates and joint ventures (IFRS 12.B12 through B13) requires twelve specific line items per investee. Multiply that across two or four investments and the disclosure note grows fast.

Your file needs a structured approach. A paragraph-by-paragraph checklist mapping each IFRS 12 requirement to the draft financial statements is the only reliable method. Reviewing IFRS 12 disclosures without a checklist produces the same result every year: the engagement team confirms the investee list is complete, misses half the detailed requirements, and the review partner finds the gaps at sign-off.

Significant judgments and assumptions: IFRS 12.7 through IFRS 12.9

IFRS 12.7 requires disclosure of significant judgments and assumptions made in determining the nature of an interest in another entity or arrangement, and in determining the type of joint arrangement. IFRS 12.8 and IFRS 12.9 give specific examples.

IFRS 12.9(a) requires disclosure when the client has determined it controls another entity even though it holds less than a majority of voting rights. This applies to de facto control situations where the client holds, for example, 45% of the voting rights and the remaining shares are widely dispersed. The disclosure must explain why the client concluded it has control despite holding less than half the votes. IFRS 12.9(b) requires the equivalent disclosure when the client has determined it does not control another entity even though it holds more than half the voting rights (protective rights, contractual restrictions on decision-making).

IFRS 12.7(c) requires disclosure of significant judgments and assumptions made in determining the type of joint arrangement (joint operation or joint venture). If the classification turned on the contractual terms overriding the legal form (the scenario described in the ciferi IFRS 11 guide), the financial statements must explain that judgment. This means describing the specific contractual provisions that led to the conclusion and why they were determinative.

Regulators flag this disclosure more than any other IFRS 12 requirement. The AFM’s reviews of structured entity disclosures have consistently noted that clients state conclusions without explaining the judgments underpinning them. “The Group has determined that it controls Entity X” without any explanation of the basis for that conclusion does not meet IFRS 12.7. The fix is straightforward: describe the specific facts that led to the judgment.

Compare the engagement team’s own documentation (the IFRS 10 control assessment, the IFRS 11 classification analysis) against what appears in the notes. If the engagement file contains a detailed control analysis but the notes contain a single sentence, the disclosure is incomplete.

Subsidiary disclosures: what IFRS 12.10 through IFRS 12.19 require

IFRS 12 requires two distinct categories of subsidiary disclosure. The first applies to every subsidiary. IFRS 12.10 requires disclosure of the composition of the group, including the name of each subsidiary, the principal place of business, the proportion of ownership interests held, and (if different) the proportion of voting rights held. For subsidiaries with material non-controlling interests (NCI), the requirements expand significantly.

IFRS 12.12 requires disclosure for each subsidiary with NCI that is material to the reporting entity. The required disclosures include the name of the subsidiary, the proportion of ownership interests held by NCI, profit or loss allocated to NCI during the period, accumulated NCI at the end of the period, and summarised financial information about the subsidiary.

The summarised financial information for subsidiaries with material NCI is specified in IFRS 12.B10. It includes current assets, non-current assets, current liabilities, non-current liabilities, revenue, profit or loss, total other comprehensive income, cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities, and cash flows from financing activities. This is not a condensed income statement and balance sheet. It is ten specific line items, each of which must appear in the notes. Most mid-market clients with material NCI disclose only profit or loss and NCI balance.

IFRS 12.13 adds a requirement that applies when there are significant restrictions on the parent’s ability to access or use assets and settle liabilities of the group. Restrictions include protective rights of non-controlling interests, regulatory requirements, and contractual arrangements. If a subsidiary operates in a jurisdiction where dividend repatriation requires regulatory approval, IFRS 12.13 requires disclosure of the nature and extent of that restriction.

Associate and joint venture disclosures: the summarised financial information requirement

IFRS 12.20 through IFRS 12.23 require disclosures for interests in associates and joint ventures. The nature and extent of the interest, the risks associated with it, and the effects on the client’s financial position must all be addressed.

IFRS 12.21(b) requires disclosure of summarised financial information for each associate or joint venture that is material to the reporting client. The specific items are listed in IFRS 12.B12 and IFRS 12.B13: current assets, non-current assets, current liabilities, non-current liabilities, revenue, profit or loss from continuing operations, post-tax profit or loss from discontinued operations, other comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income. Critically, IFRS 12.B14 requires these amounts to be the full figures from the associate’s or joint venture’s own IFRS financial statements (adjusted for fair value adjustments at acquisition and equity method modifications), not the client’s share of those amounts.

This distinction matters. Clients frequently disclose their 30% share of the associate’s revenue and profit. IFRS 12.B14 requires disclosure of 100% of the associate’s revenue and profit. The reconciliation from the summarised financial information to the carrying amount of the interest is then disclosed separately under IFRS 12.B12(b).

For individually immaterial associates and joint ventures, IFRS 12.21(c) requires disclosure of aggregate carrying amount and aggregate amounts of the client’s share of profit or loss, other comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income.

Your file should identify which associates and joint ventures are material (apply your firm’s materiality threshold), prepare the disclosure checklist for each material investee, and verify that the summarised financial information reconciles to the equity method carrying amount.

Joint arrangement disclosures: what goes beyond IFRS 11

IFRS 12.20 through IFRS 12.23 apply to joint ventures (equity-accounted), and the summarised financial information requirements described above apply in full. For joint operations, the disclosure requirements are lighter because the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses are already recognised line by line in the client’s financial statements. The primary IFRS 12 disclosure for joint operations is IFRS 12.21(a): the name, nature of the relationship, principal place of business, and proportion of ownership interest (and voting rights if different).

IFRS 12.7(c) adds a significant judgment disclosure for the classification itself. If the joint arrangement is structured through a separate vehicle and the classification required analysis of contractual terms, that analysis must be described in the notes. This is the disclosure most frequently missing on files involving joint operations structured through B.V.s. The engagement team performs the classification analysis in the working papers but does not check whether the client reproduces the key judgments in the financial statements. Your review should cross-reference the IFRS 11 working paper against the IFRS 12 note.

Commitments and contingent liabilities relating to joint ventures and associates require separate disclosure under IFRS 12.22. The client’s share of capital commitments, commitments to provide funding, and guarantees given must all be disclosed. Contingent liabilities include both the client’s share of the joint venture’s contingent liabilities and any contingent liabilities of the client itself relating to the arrangement.

Unconsolidated structured entities: the disclosure most clients forget entirely

IFRS 12.24 through IFRS 12.31 require disclosures about unconsolidated structured entities in which the client has an interest. An unconsolidated structured entity is one designed so that voting or similar rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls it (IFRS 12.B21). Securitisation vehicles, asset-backed financing arrangements, and some fund structures fall into this category.

Most mid-market clients do not have interests in unconsolidated structured entities. The risk is when they do and nobody identifies them.

Once identified, the IFRS 12.24 through IFRS 12.31 disclosures apply in full. A client that provides a guarantee to a special purpose vehicle for a property financing arrangement has an interest. So does a client holding subordinated notes in a securitisation vehicle. IFRS 12.26 requires disclosure of the nature and extent of the interest, including the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the structured entity, and how it is financed. IFRS 12.29 requires disclosure of the maximum exposure to loss and how that maximum exposure is determined. These two requirements together form the core of the structured entity note.

At planning, ask one specific question: does the client have any interests in entities not controlled through voting rights? If yes, map the disclosures. If the answer is uncertain, send examples to management (guarantees, subordinated lending, variable interests in off-balance-sheet vehicles) and ask again. A blank response without investigation is not sufficient audit evidence for concluding that no structured entity interests exist.

Worked example: Van Leeuwen Groep N.V. and its five interests

Scenario: Van Leeuwen Groep N.V. (revenue €95M, industrial equipment distribution) has the following interests: (1) Van Leeuwen Duitsland GmbH, a 100% subsidiary in Germany; (2) Van Leeuwen Belgie N.V., an 80% subsidiary with 20% NCI held by a local partner; (3) Hafentechnik AG, a 35% associate in Switzerland; (4) Logistiek Centrum Rijn B.V., a 50/50 joint operation (classified per IFRS 11 based on an output purchase clause); (5) a guarantee over a property financing SPV (Van Leeuwen Vastgoed Fonds) that the group does not control. The client’s IFRS 12 note lists the five entities with ownership percentages and principal place of business. No other disclosures are provided.

Step 1: Map IFRS 12 requirements to each interest

Van Leeuwen Duitsland (100% subsidiary): IFRS 12.10 disclosures (name, country, ownership). No material NCI, so IFRS 12.12 summarised financial information is not required.

Van Leeuwen Belgie (80% subsidiary, 20% NCI): IFRS 12.10 disclosures plus, if the NCI is material, IFRS 12.12 requires name, NCI ownership proportion, NCI profit or loss, accumulated NCI, and summarised financial information per IFRS 12.B10 (ten line items). Assess whether the 20% NCI is material relative to Van Leeuwen Groep’s consolidated financial statements.

Step 2: Assess the associate disclosure requirements

Hafentechnik AG (35% associate): if material, IFRS 12.21(b) requires summarised financial information per IFRS 12.B12 (nine line items at 100%, not the investor’s 30% share), plus the reconciliation to carrying amount per IFRS 12.B12(b). The client must also disclose commitments, contingent liabilities, and the fair value of the investment if it is publicly quoted (IFRS 12.21(a) and B16).

Hafentechnik has total assets of CHF 22M and revenue of CHF 18M. At 35%, Van Leeuwen’s carrying amount is €5.8M. Against group materiality of €1.9M, this is material.

Step 3: Assess the joint operation disclosure requirements

Logistiek Centrum Rijn B.V. (50/50 joint operation): IFRS 12.21(a) basic disclosures apply (name, nature, country, ownership). The classification judgment must be disclosed under IFRS 12.7(c), including the output purchase clause that determined the classification. Because the assets and liabilities are already recognised line by line, summarised financial information under IFRS 12.B12 is not required.

Step 4: Assess the unconsolidated structured entity disclosure requirements

Van Leeuwen Vastgoed Fonds (guarantee over property financing SPV): IFRS 12.26 requires disclosure of the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the SPV, and how it is financed. IFRS 12.29 requires disclosure of the maximum exposure to loss from the guarantee. If the guarantee is capped at €3.5M, that figure must appear in the notes.

Conclusion: The client’s existing two-paragraph IFRS 12 note covers approximately 15% of the required disclosures. The file now contains a mapped schedule showing each IFRS 12 requirement, the investee it applies to, the paragraph reference, and whether the draft financial statements address it. This schedule becomes the disclosure deficiency list for the management letter.

Practical checklist for your next IFRS 12 disclosure review

1. At planning, list every interest the client holds: subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures, joint operations, and unconsolidated structured entities. For each, note the ownership percentage and whether the interest is material to the group financial statements.
2. For each material subsidiary with NCI, verify the ten IFRS 12.B10 line items are disclosed in the notes. For each material associate or joint venture, verify the nine IFRS 12.B12 line items are disclosed at 100% (not the investor’s share), plus the reconciliation to carrying amount.
3. Check the IFRS 12.7 through IFRS 12.9 significant judgment disclosures. If the engagement file contains a control assessment, an IFRS 11 classification analysis, or any other judgment about the nature of an interest, verify that the notes disclose the judgment and its basis. A conclusion without explanation does not meet IFRS 12.7.
4. Ask management whether the client has any interests in unconsolidated structured entities (IFRS 12.24 through IFRS 12.31). Provide examples: guarantees over SPVs, subordinated lending to financing vehicles, variable interests in fund structures. If the answer is yes, map the IFRS 12.26 and IFRS 12.29 disclosures.
5. Compare total IFRS 12 disclosure volume against the complexity of the group’s interests. A client with four subsidiaries, an associate, and a joint arrangement that produces two paragraphs of IFRS 12 notes almost certainly has disclosure gaps.

Common mistakes

• Disclosing summarised financial information for associates and joint ventures at the investor’s share (e.g., 30% of revenue) instead of 100% as required by IFRS 12.B14. The FRC’s disclosure reviews have specifically flagged this error, noting that entities present their share of an associate’s profit without disclosing the associate’s total revenue, total assets, or other required line items.
• Omitting the IFRS 12.7 through IFRS 12.9 significant judgment disclosures entirely. The AFM’s thematic reviews on consolidation and interests in other entities have found that entities state classification conclusions (e.g., “the Group controls Entity X”) without explaining the basis for the judgment, particularly in cases involving de facto control or joint arrangement classification.

Related content

Related guides:

Put audit concepts into practice with these free tools:

Frequently asked questions

Further reading and source references

• IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities: the full disclosure framework for subsidiaries, associates, joint arrangements, and unconsolidated structured entities.
• IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements: the control framework that determines subsidiary classification.
• IAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures: equity method mechanics referenced in the summarised financial information reconciliation.
• IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements: the classification framework that feeds into IFRS 12.7(c) significant judgment disclosures.
• Equity method: Ciferi glossary entry on IAS 28 equity method accounting.