IAS 37 (as issued by IASB) · IRBA / JSE

IAS 37 Provision Calculator
South Africa

IAS 37 provision assessment with South Africa-specific regulatory guidance, IRBA / JSE expectations, and local legal framework considerations.

Obligation Type

Present Obligation

Does a present obligation exist from a past event?

IAS 37 Provision Assessment Toolkit — free PDF

Complete audit toolkit: IAS 37 recognition decision flowchart, measurement methodology guide, discounting worked examples, disclosure checklist, provision type cheat sheet, and journal entry templates.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

IAS 37.14 — A provision shall be recognised when: (a) an entity has a present obligation from a past event; (b) it is probable that an outflow will be required; (c) a reliable estimate can be made.

IAS 37.36 — The amount recognised shall be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.

IAS 37.39 — Where there is a large population of items, the obligation is estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities (expected value).

IAS 37.45 — Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision shall be the present value of the expenditures expected to settle the obligation.

IAS 37.72 — A constructive obligation to restructure arises only when an entity has a detailed formal plan and has raised a valid expectation in those affected.

IAS 37 Application in South Africa

South Africa applies IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) without modification. The Financial Reporting Standards Council (FRSC), operating under the Companies Act 71 of 2008, prescribes IFRS as issued by the IASB for entities required to apply IFRS. The JSE Limited (Johannesburg Stock Exchange) Listings Requirements mandate IFRS for all listed entities, and the Companies Act 2008 requires financial statements to comply with financial reporting standards. The Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) regulates the audit profession and conducts quality inspections that include examination of provision adequacy and audit quality. South Africa's economic context creates distinctive provision considerations: mining and resources entities carry significant environmental rehabilitation provisions under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA), listed companies face provisions arising from Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) compliance, and all entities must navigate the obligations created by South Africa's extensive labour legislation including the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995.

IRBA / JSE Regulatory Expectations

The IRBA conducts audit quality inspections under the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005 and has identified provisions as a recurring area of concern. Common IRBA inspection findings relate to the adequacy of auditor challenge over provision estimates, particularly for mining rehabilitation obligations and litigation provisions. The JSE's proactive monitoring programme reviews financial statements for IFRS compliance, and has raised queries regarding provision disclosure quality and the completeness of contingent liability disclosures. The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) supervises financial reporting for financial institutions and has expectations regarding the adequacy of provisions for customer redress and regulatory penalties. The South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA) provides interpretive guidance on IFRS application in the South African context, including practice notes on IAS 37 application. The Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) sets regulatory requirements for mine closure financial provisioning that interact with IAS 37 provision recognition, although the regulatory financial provision and the IAS 37 accounting provision may differ in amount due to measurement differences.

Practical Guidance for South Africa

South African entities applying IAS 37 face unique provision challenges shaped by the country's legal and regulatory framework. For mining entities, the MPRDA and the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) create legal obligations for mine closure, rehabilitation, and ongoing environmental management. The DMRE requires financial provisioning for mine rehabilitation through a dedicated financial provision (historically a trust fund, now increasingly financial guarantees), and the South African Revenue Service (SARS) allows tax deductions for rehabilitation expenditure under Section 37A of the Income Tax Act. The IAS 37 provision should reflect the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the rehabilitation obligation, discounted at a pre-tax rate. South African Government Bond yields should be used as the starting point for the risk-free discount rate, but given South Africa's relatively high bond yields compared to developed markets, the discount rate selection has a material impact on long-term provision balances. For restructuring provisions, the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 creates specific obligations for retrenchments (redundancies), including mandatory consultation with trade unions and the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA).

Audit Expectations

The IRBA has consistently identified the audit of provisions as a key area requiring improvement in South African audits. Common inspection findings include insufficient challenge of management's mine closure and rehabilitation cost estimates, particularly regarding the technical assumptions underlying remediation cost calculations, inadequate evaluation of the completeness of the provision population for legal claims and environmental obligations, limited assessment of the discount rate applied to long-term provisions and whether it appropriately reflects South African market conditions, and insufficient procedures over the completeness and accuracy of data inputs to actuarial provision models. South African auditors are expected to comply with the International Standards on Auditing (ISA) as adopted by the IRBA, including ISA 540 on auditing accounting estimates. The IRBA has emphasised the need for auditors to engage specialists for complex provision estimates and to maintain professional scepticism when evaluating provision amounts that appear to minimise the entity's recognised obligations. The King IV Report on Corporate Governance also creates expectations regarding audit committee oversight of material provision estimates.

South Africa-Specific Considerations

South Africa-specific IAS 37 considerations are shaped by several distinctive features of the South African legal and business environment. The mining sector's environmental rehabilitation obligations under the MPRDA and NEMA are among the most significant provision items in South African corporate reporting, with major mining houses carrying provisions running to billions of rands. The financial provisioning regulations require mining companies to assess their rehabilitation liabilities annually and to maintain adequate financial provision, creating a regulatory framework that directly informs IAS 37 provision estimation. The B-BBEE framework may create constructive obligations where entities have published transformation commitments that create valid expectations. South Africa's extensive labour legislation, including the Labour Relations Act, the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, and the Employment Equity Act, creates specific obligations relevant to restructuring provisions. The CCMA process for retrenchments must be followed, and the estimated costs should include all statutory and contractual severance payments. South Africa's legal aid and public interest litigation framework, combined with constitutional rights provisions, can create litigation exposure for corporates in areas such as environmental damage, occupational health (particularly silicosis and asbestos-related claims in the mining sector), and consumer protection under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008.

Common Audit Inspection Findings — South Africa

Mine closure rehabilitation provision estimates not independently challenged — auditor accepted management's cost assumptions without environmental or engineering specialist involvement

Completeness of silicosis and occupational health litigation provisions not adequately assessed — known class action exposure not reflected in provision or contingent liability disclosures

Discount rate for long-term rehabilitation provisions not adequately evaluated — rate not benchmarked to South African Government Bond yields given the country's specific yield curve

Restructuring provision recognised before CCMA consultation process completed — Labour Relations Act retrenchment procedures not followed prior to the reporting date

Frequently Asked Questions — South Africa

How is IAS 37 applied in South Africa?
South Africa applies IAS 37 as issued by the IASB without modification. The Financial Reporting Standards Council (FRSC) under the Companies Act 2008 prescribes IFRS for publicly accountable entities, and the JSE Listings Requirements mandate IFRS for all listed companies. IAS 37 applies identically to the IASB-issued version. SAICA provides interpretive guidance on the application of IAS 37 in the South African context, including practice notes addressing mining rehabilitation provisions, litigation provisions, and environmental obligations under South African law.
What does the IRBA expect regarding audit of provisions?
The IRBA expects auditors to apply robust procedures when auditing provisions. This includes independently challenging management's probability assessments, engaging specialists for material mine closure and environmental provisions, testing the completeness of the provision and contingent liability population, evaluating the appropriateness of discount rates considering South African market conditions, and performing retrospective reviews of prior-year provision estimates. The IRBA has identified provisions as a recurring area of inspection findings and expects enhanced audit attention to this area.
How do South African mining regulations interact with IAS 37?
The MPRDA and NEMA create legal obligations for mine closure rehabilitation that give rise to IAS 37 provisions. The DMRE requires financial provisioning through dedicated mechanisms (trust funds, guarantees), but the regulatory financial provision may differ from the IAS 37 accounting provision due to measurement differences. The IAS 37 provision should reflect the entity's best estimate of the expenditure required, discounted at a pre-tax rate. Section 37A of the Income Tax Act provides tax deductions for rehabilitation expenditure. Entities should reconcile the regulatory and accounting provisions and explain any significant differences.
What are country-specific provision considerations for South African entities?
Key South Africa-specific considerations include: mine rehabilitation provisions governed by the MPRDA and NEMA, which can be billions of rands for large mining operations; silicosis and occupational health litigation provisions, which have resulted in multi-billion rand class action settlements; restructuring provisions governed by the Labour Relations Act retrenchment process; environmental provisions under NEMA's 'polluter pays' principle; and provisions arising from B-BBEE commitments that may create constructive obligations. South Africa's relatively high government bond yields compared to developed markets mean that discount rate selection has a particularly significant impact on long-term provision balances.
What are common IRBA audit inspection findings related to provisions?
The IRBA has identified recurring deficiencies including: insufficient challenge of mine closure provision cost estimates without specialist input, inadequate assessment of the completeness of litigation provisions — particularly for occupational health claims in the mining sector, limited evaluation of discount rates in the context of South African government bond yields, insufficient procedures over the accuracy of data inputs to actuarial or technical provision models, and failure to assess whether restructuring provisions meet IAS 37.72 criteria before the CCMA consultation process has been completed.

IAS 37 Provision Calculator

General (Hub)

Related IFRS Tools

IFRS 9 ECL Calculator IFRS 16 Lease Calculator Going Concern Checklist Materiality Calculator