Obligation Type
Present Obligation
Does a present obligation exist from a past event?
IAS 37 Provision Assessment Toolkit — free PDF
Complete audit toolkit: IAS 37 recognition decision flowchart, measurement methodology guide, discounting worked examples, disclosure checklist, provision type cheat sheet, and journal entry templates.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
IAS 37.14 — A provision shall be recognised when: (a) an entity has a present obligation from a past event; (b) it is probable that an outflow will be required; (c) a reliable estimate can be made.
IAS 37.36 — The amount recognised shall be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.
IAS 37.39 — Where there is a large population of items, the obligation is estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities (expected value).
IAS 37.45 — Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision shall be the present value of the expenditures expected to settle the obligation.
IAS 37.72 — A constructive obligation to restructure arises only when an entity has a detailed formal plan and has raised a valid expectation in those affected.
IAS 37 Application in France
France adopted IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets through EU endorsement. IAS 37 is mandatory for French entities preparing consolidated IFRS financial statements, which includes companies listed on Euronext Paris and groups exceeding the IFRS reporting thresholds. The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) supervises financial reporting quality for listed entities, while the Haut Conseil du Commissariat aux Comptes (H3C) oversees audit quality. Under French GAAP, provisions are governed by the Plan Comptable Général (PCG), specifically Règlement ANC 2014-03, which refers to provisions as 'provisions pour risques et charges'. The PCG framework for provisions differs from IAS 37 in several important respects, including the recognition of provisions for major repairs (provisions pour grosses réparations) and provisions for charges to be distributed over several periods (provisions pour charges à répartir), neither of which has an equivalent under IAS 37. France's extensive regulatory environment, including the Code de commerce, the Code de l'environnement, and the Code du travail, creates a broad range of legal obligations that may give rise to IAS 37 provisions.
H3C / AMF Regulatory Expectations
The AMF has examined IAS 37 application through its annual report on corporate reporting and has published recommendations on provision disclosures. The AMF has noted that French entities frequently aggregate provisions in a manner that prevents investors from understanding individual obligations, and that disclosure of the assumptions and uncertainties underlying provision estimates is often insufficient. The H3C, as the audit oversight body, has conducted inspections examining how auditors challenge provision estimates and assess the completeness of the provision population. The Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes (CNCC) has issued technical guidance addressing the audit of provisions under both IFRS and French GAAP, including NEP 540 on auditing accounting estimates. The Autorité des Normes Comptables (ANC) issues French GAAP rules through its Règlements, and provides interpretive guidance on the PCG provision requirements. French entities face a complex regulatory landscape where the Code de commerce, the Code monétaire et financier, and sector-specific regulations can all create legal obligations giving rise to provisions.
Practical Guidance for France
French entities applying IAS 37 should be aware of the differences between IFRS provisions and PCG provisions pour risques et charges. Under the PCG, provisions for major repairs (provisions pour grosses réparations) are permitted under Règlement ANC 2014-03, allowing entities to build up provisions for planned major maintenance expenditure. IAS 37 does not permit such provisions because there is no present obligation to a third party — the entity can avoid the expenditure by selling or abandoning the asset. Similarly, PCG provisions for charges to be distributed (charges à répartir) have no IAS 37 equivalent. For measurement, the PCG generally uses undiscounted amounts for provisions, whereas IAS 37.45 requires discounting when the time value of money is material. French entities should use Obligations Assimilables du Trésor (OAT) yields as the basis for the risk-free discount rate under IAS 37. Restructuring provisions under French law must consider the obligations créated by the Plan de Sauvegarde de l'Emploi (PSE), which mandates specific procedures for collective redundancies and may include redeployment obligations, outplacement costs, and enhanced severance beyond the indemnité légale de licenciement.
Audit Expectations
French statutory auditors (commissaires aux comptes) must comply with the Normes d'Exercice Professionnel (NEP) when auditing provisions. NEP 540 on accounting estimates is particularly relevant. The H3C has identified provisions as an area where audit quality requires improvement, with common inspection findings including insufficient challenge of management's assessment of whether an obligation is present, inadequate evaluation of the completeness of litigation and environmental provisions, limited independent assessment of provision measurement assumptions, and failure to evaluate whether PCG-specific provision categories (grosses réparations, charges à répartir) have been appropriately eliminated on consolidation into IFRS. French auditors should obtain letters from the entity's avocats (lawyers) confirming the status and estimated outcomes of material litigation, and should consider the impact of the French legal system's specificities — including the distinction between juridictions civiles and juridictions administratives — on the probability and timing of obligation settlement.
France-Specific Considerations
France-specific IAS 37 considerations include the extensive obligations created by French employment law (Code du travail). The Plan de Sauvegarde de l'Emploi (PSE) for collective redundancies involving 10 or more employees creates detailed obligations including redeployment measures, outplacement support, and enhanced severance payments that must be provided for under IAS 37 when the plan is formally adopted and communicated. The indemnité de départ à la retraite (retirement indemnity) is a specific French obligation that may be treated as a provision or as an employee benefit depending on its nature. French environmental law under the Code de l'environnement, including the régime des installations classées pour la protection de l'environnement (ICPE), imposes obligations on operators of classified installations to remediate sites upon cessation of activity. The Loi relative à la responsabilité environnementale creates strict liability for environmental damage. French entities operating nuclear installations face decommissioning obligations governed by specific legislation (Code de l'énergie), which can give rise to provisions of extraordinary magnitude — EDF's nuclear decommissioning provisions alone exceed tens of billions of euros.
Common Audit Inspection Findings — France
PCG provisions pour grosses réparations not eliminated on IFRS consolidation — provisions recognised under French GAAP that have no basis under IAS 37 were carried forward into consolidated IFRS statements
Restructuring provision recognised before PSE was formally communicated — IAS 37.72 requirement for a valid expectation in those affected not demonstrated
Legal claim provisions measured without obtaining or evaluating avocat confirmations — probability assessment not supported by independent legal evidence
Long-term ICPE environmental remediation provisions not discounted — material overstatement of provision balance
Contingent liability disclosures for ongoing regulatory proceedings insufficient — nature, estimated financial effect, and uncertainties not adequately described