IAS 37 (as adopted in IFRS for Canada) · CPA Canada / OSC

IAS 37 Provision Calculator
Canada

IAS 37 provision assessment with Canada-specific regulatory guidance, CPA Canada / OSC expectations, and local legal framework considerations.

Obligation Type

Present Obligation

Does a present obligation exist from a past event?

IAS 37 Provision Assessment Toolkit — free PDF

Complete audit toolkit: IAS 37 recognition decision flowchart, measurement methodology guide, discounting worked examples, disclosure checklist, provision type cheat sheet, and journal entry templates.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

IAS 37.14 — A provision shall be recognised when: (a) an entity has a present obligation from a past event; (b) it is probable that an outflow will be required; (c) a reliable estimate can be made.

IAS 37.36 — The amount recognised shall be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.

IAS 37.39 — Where there is a large population of items, the obligation is estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities (expected value).

IAS 37.45 — Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision shall be the present value of the expenditures expected to settle the obligation.

IAS 37.72 — A constructive obligation to restructure arises only when an entity has a detailed formal plan and has raised a valid expectation in those affected.

IAS 37 Application in Canada

Canada adopted IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets as part of its transition to IFRS for publicly accountable enterprises, effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. The Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) of Canada adopted IFRS as Canadian GAAP for publicly accountable enterprises, and IAS 37 is incorporated into Part I of the CPA Canada Handbook — Accounting. The standard applies to entities listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and TSX Venture Exchange, as well as other publicly accountable enterprises. Private enterprises in Canada may apply Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE), where provisions are addressed under Section 3290 Contingencies, which differs from IAS 37 in several respects. The Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and other provincial securities regulators, coordinated through the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), oversee financial reporting compliance. CPA Canada has issued guidance and research publications addressing practical application of IAS 37, and the Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) conducts audit quality inspections that have identified provisions as a recurring focus area.

CPA Canada / OSC Regulatory Expectations

Canadian securities regulators, particularly the OSC and CSA, review financial statements for compliance with IFRS including IAS 37. The CSA has published Staff Notices addressing provision-related disclosure deficiencies, noting that some issuers provide insufficient information about the nature of obligations, the key measurement assumptions, and the uncertainties affecting provision amounts. CPAB has conducted thematic inspections focusing on the audit of accounting estimates, including provisions, and has identified areas where audit quality requires improvement. CPA Canada has published research reports and guidance, including the Auditing and Assurance Handbook sections relevant to the audit of estimates (CAS 540), and practice advisories addressing the unique provision challenges faced by Canadian entities in the oil and gas, mining, and financial services sectors. The AcSB has generally adopted IAS 37 without Canadian-specific amendments, maintaining alignment with the IASB-issued standard. The CSA's continuous disclosure review programme regularly identifies provision disclosure as an area where improvement is needed.

Practical Guidance for Canada

Canadian entities applying IAS 37 should ensure their provision processes address the full range of obligations arising from Canada's regulatory environment. For oil and gas entities, asset retirement obligations (AROs) under IAS 37 and IFRIC 1 are among the most significant provisions in Canadian corporate reporting. The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), the British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission (BCOGC), and the Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources impose reclamation obligations on oil and gas operators, including well abandonment, surface reclamation, and ongoing monitoring. These provisions should be discounted using a pre-tax rate referencing Government of Canada bond yields matched to the expected timing of the cash outflows. For mining entities, similar reclamation obligations arise under provincial mining acts and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. Canadian entities should also consider provisions arising under the Canada Labour Code and provincial employment standards legislation for restructuring provisions, and product liability provisions arising under provincial consumer protection legislation and the federal Consumer Product Safety Act.

Audit Expectations

CPAB has consistently identified the audit of provisions as a key area of focus in its audit quality inspections. Common findings include insufficient challenge of management's assumptions for asset retirement obligations, particularly regarding the estimated costs and timing of reclamation activities, inadequate procedures to test the completeness of the provision population including environmental obligations at inactive or legacy sites, limited independent assessment of the discount rates applied to long-term provisions, and insufficient evaluation of whether restructuring provisions meet all IAS 37.72 recognition criteria. Canadian auditors are expected to comply with Canadian Auditing Standards (CAS), which are based on ISAs with limited Canadian-specific modifications. CAS 540 Auditing Accounting Estimates requires auditors to assess the methods, significant assumptions, and data used by management in developing provision estimates. CPAB has emphasised the importance of auditors engaging specialists for material provision estimates involving environmental remediation, engineering cost estimation, or actuarial assessments.

Canada-Specific Considerations

Canada-specific IAS 37 considerations are significantly influenced by the natural resources sector. Oil and gas entities listed on the TSX carry material asset retirement obligations for well abandonment, pipeline decommissioning, and surface reclamation, governed by a complex web of federal and provincial regulations. The Orphan Well Association in Alberta and similar bodies in other provinces manage the reclamation of wells where the responsible party has become insolvent, and the associated levies may create additional obligations. Mining entities face reclamation obligations under provincial mining acts and federal environmental legislation. The distinction between IFRS and ASPE is significant for Canadian private enterprises: ASPE Section 3110 Asset Retirement Obligations and Section 3290 Contingencies differ from IAS 37 in measurement and recognition requirements, and entities transitioning from ASPE to IFRS must carefully assess the impact on provision balances. Canadian constitutional law divides environmental jurisdiction between federal and provincial governments, meaning entities operating across provinces may face different regulatory obligations in each jurisdiction. Class action litigation is prevalent in Canada, with class proceedings acts in most provinces facilitating multi-plaintiff claims that can give rise to material provisions.

Common Audit Inspection Findings — Canada

Asset retirement obligation estimates not independently challenged — auditor accepted management's reclamation cost assumptions without specialist assessment or comparison to industry benchmarks

Completeness of environmental provisions at inactive sites not adequately tested — legacy sites not assessed for current regulatory obligations

Discount rate for long-term reclamation provisions not adequately assessed — rate not referenced to Government of Canada bond yields

Restructuring provision recognised before detailed formal plan communicated to affected employees — IAS 37.72 criteria not demonstrated to be met

Contingent liability disclosures for class action proceedings incomplete — material possible obligations not adequately described

Frequently Asked Questions — Canada

How is IAS 37 adopted in Canada?
IAS 37 is adopted as part of IFRS for publicly accountable enterprises in Canada, incorporated into Part I of the CPA Canada Handbook — Accounting. The AcSB adopted IFRS without Canadian-specific amendments to IAS 37, maintaining full alignment with the IASB-issued standard. All entities listed on the TSX and TSX Venture Exchange must apply IAS 37. Private enterprises may apply ASPE, where provisions are addressed under Section 3290 Contingencies and Section 3110 Asset Retirement Obligations, which have different recognition and measurement requirements.
What do Canadian securities regulators expect for provision disclosures?
The CSA and provincial securities regulators expect IFRS-compliant provision disclosures including the nature of the obligation, expected timing of outflows, key measurement assumptions, and uncertainties affecting the amount. CSA Staff Notices have highlighted deficiencies including overly aggregated provision disclosures, insufficient explanation of material changes in provision balances, and inadequate contingent liability disclosures. The OSC's continuous disclosure review programme regularly raises provision disclosure issues with issuers, particularly for asset retirement obligations in the oil and gas sector.
How does IAS 37 interact with ASPE for Canadian private enterprises?
ASPE Section 3290 Contingencies uses a different recognition threshold than IAS 37: ASPE recognises contingent losses when the outcome is 'likely' (generally interpreted as more likely than not), which is conceptually similar to IAS 37's 'probable' threshold but may differ in practical application. ASPE Section 3110 addresses asset retirement obligations specifically, with measurement requirements that differ from IAS 37 and IFRIC 1. Entities transitioning from ASPE to IFRS must reassess their provisions under IAS 37 criteria, which may result in different amounts due to discounting requirements, measurement bases, and scope differences.
What are country-specific provision considerations for Canadian oil and gas entities?
Canadian oil and gas entities face extensive asset retirement obligations governed by provincial regulators including the AER, BCOGC, and Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources. Provisions must cover well abandonment, facility decommissioning, pipeline removal, and surface reclamation. Estimated costs should reflect current industry rates for abandonment and reclamation activities, adjusted for site-specific factors. The liability management frameworks in Alberta and other provinces assess operators' liability-to-asset ratios, creating regulatory pressure for accurate provision estimation. The Orphan Well Association levies represent additional potential obligations.
What are common CPAB audit inspection findings related to provisions?
CPAB has identified recurring findings including: insufficient challenge of management's asset retirement obligation estimates — auditors accepted cost and timing assumptions without independent assessment or specialist involvement, inadequate testing of provision completeness for inactive or legacy sites, limited evaluation of discount rate appropriateness for long-term provisions, insufficient assessment of whether environmental obligations at acquired properties were appropriately identified and measured in business combinations, and failure to perform retrospective reviews comparing actual reclamation costs with previously recognised provision estimates.

IAS 37 Provision Calculator

General (Hub)

Related IFRS Tools

IFRS 9 ECL Calculator IFRS 16 Lease Calculator Going Concern Checklist Materiality Calculator