Financial Ratio Calculator
Germany

Financial Ratio Analysis in Germany — ISA [DE] 520 / IDW PS 270

Financial ratio analysis in Germany operates within a dual-framework environment where publicly listed companies report under EU-adopted IFRS while the vast majority of German enterprises, including the Mittelstand, prepare statutory accounts under the Handelsgesetzbuch. German auditors performing Abschlussprüfungen apply ISA as adopted through EU regulation, supplemented by national standards issued by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW). IDW Prüfungsstandard 520 aligns with international requirements for analytical procedures but incorporates German-specific implementation guidance. The Abschlussprüferaufsichtsstelle (APAS) inspects audit quality for public interest entity auditors and has identified analytical procedures, including ratio analysis, as a recurring focus area in its inspection programme. German practitioners must navigate both the conservative valuation principles of HGB accounting and the fair-value orientation of IFRS when interpreting financial ratios.

Regulatory Context — IDW / APAS

The IDW has issued substantial guidance on analytical procedures through IDW PS 520 and related practice aids. APAS inspection reports have noted deficiencies in how German auditors apply ratio analysis, including insufficient documentation of expectations formed at the planning stage and inadequate investigation of ratio movements identified during substantive testing. The IDW's going concern standard, IDW PS 270, requires auditors to consider financial indicators of going concern doubt, explicitly referencing liquidity ratios, leverage ratios, and profitability trends. For entities subject to the German Corporate Governance Code (Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex), the supervisory board's audit committee is expected to monitor financial risk indicators, creating an additional layer of governance around financial ratio assessment. APAS has emphasised that auditors should not rely solely on management-prepared ratio analyses but should develop independent expectations.

Practical Guidance for Germany

German auditors benefit from well-established benchmarking sources. The Deutsche Bundesbank publishes detailed sectoral financial statistics including balance sheet and income statement ratios for German enterprises, disaggregated by industry and company size. Creditreform and Bürgel provide company-specific credit rating data incorporating financial ratios. The IDW's industry-specific audit guides (Branchenspezifische Prüfungshinweise) contain recommended ratio analyses for sectors including manufacturing, retail, banking, and insurance. When analysing HGB financial statements, auditors must account for the conservative measurement principles: hidden reserves from the lower-of-cost-or-market principle (Niederstwertprinzip), provisions measured at settlement amount (Erfüllungsbetrag), and the absence of fair value measurement for most assets. These features mean that HGB-based ratios may systematically differ from IFRS-based ratios for the same entity.

Audit Expectations

APAS inspections have revealed specific patterns of deficiency in German audit firms' application of ratio analysis. Common findings include the use of generic ratio templates without tailoring to the specific entity or industry, acceptance of immaterial ratio movements without investigating whether aggregation effects might conceal material misstatements, failure to consider the impact of HGB-specific accounting policies on ratio comparability over time, and insufficient linkage between ratio analysis findings and the audit strategy. The Wirtschaftsprüferkammer (WPK) peer review programme has similarly identified analytical procedures as an area where smaller and medium-sized firms need improvement. German auditors are expected to demonstrate in their working papers that ratio analysis informed their risk assessment and that identified anomalies were pursued through targeted substantive procedures.

Germany-Specific Considerations

Germany's insolvency framework under the Insolvenzordnung (InsO) establishes two grounds for filing insolvency proceedings: Zahlungsunfähigkeit (inability to pay debts as they fall due) and Überschuldung (over-indebtedness, where liabilities exceed assets at liquidation values). For GmbH and AG entities, directors face personal liability for failing to file insolvency proceedings within three weeks of recognising either ground. The Überschuldung test requires a separate going-concern prognosis (Fortbestehensprognose), which considers projected cash flows and financial ratios. This legal framework makes ratio analysis particularly important in German going concern assessments. The Stabilisierungs- und Restrukturierungsrahmen (StaRUG), introduced in 2021 implementing the EU Restructuring Directive, created early warning obligations for certain entities, requiring ongoing monitoring of financial ratios that might indicate impending insolvency. Auditors should evaluate whether the entity's crisis early-warning system includes appropriate ratio monitoring.

Common Inspection Findings

Analytical procedures used generic ratio templates not tailored to the entity's industry or the specific characteristics of HGB versus IFRS reporting.

The impact of HGB measurement principles on ratio comparability between periods was not considered when investigating ratio movements.

Expectations for substantive analytical procedures were not documented independently of the actual results, undermining the reliability of the procedure.

Going concern ratio analysis did not specifically address the Insolvenzordnung requirements for Zahlungsunfähigkeit and Überschuldung assessments.

Sector benchmark data from the Deutsche Bundesbank was available but not utilised, with auditors instead relying solely on prior-year comparisons.

Ratio analysis at the planning stage did not adequately feed into the risk assessment, with identified anomalies not reflected in the audit strategy.