ISA 520 · ISA 570 · Real Estate

Financial Ratio Calculator
for Real Estate

Pre-configured for property entities. Emphasises NAV/total assets, debt covenants, rental yield analysis, and IFRS 13 fair value measurement considerations.

Financial Data

Enter the essential financial figures below. Expand the additional sections for a comprehensive analysis.

Financial Ratio Analysis Guide for European Auditors — free PDF

ISA 520 & ISA 570 practical workbook: all formulas with visual explanations, industry benchmark reference tables from BACH for 15 industries, ratio interpretation guide, and template narrative paragraphs for audit working papers.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

ISA 520.5 — Design and perform analytical procedures near the end of the audit that assist in forming an overall conclusion.

ISA 520.A1 — Analytical procedures may include ratios such as gross margin percentages and ratio of sales to accounts receivable.

ISA 570.A3 — Negative working capital, adverse key financial ratios, operating losses, and other indicators may cast doubt on going concern.

Financial Ratio Analysis for Real Estate

Real estate financial ratio analysis is dominated by asset valuation and debt covenant compliance. Property companies' financial statements are fundamentally driven by fair value measurements under IAS 40 (investment property) or IAS 16 (owner-occupied property), meaning that balance sheet ratios fluctuate with property market cycles rather than operational performance alone. This creates unique challenges for analytical procedures under ISA 520.

The loan-to-value (LTV) ratio is typically the most critical covenant metric for real estate companies. Most European property financing carries LTV covenants of 50–70%, and breaching these triggers either mandatory repayment or renegotiation. Interest coverage (EBIT or EBITDA / Interest) is the second key covenant, with typical thresholds of 1.5–2.0x for property companies. The debt-to-equity ratio for property companies (median 1.80x in BACH data) is structurally higher than many sectors due to the asset-heavy, leverage-dependent business model.

Net margin can be extremely volatile for property companies because unrealised fair value gains and losses flow through profit or loss under IAS 40 (fair value model). A property company might show 40% net margin in a rising market and negative margin in a declining market, without any change in underlying rental income. For ISA 520 analytical procedures, auditors should separate rental income-based ratios (which reflect operational performance) from total P&L ratios (which are distorted by revaluation movements).

Regulatory Context

IAS 40 fair value model vs. cost model. IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy. LTV and interest coverage covenants. REIT-specific distribution requirements. Property fund NAV calculation requirements.

Industry-Specific Going Concern Indicators (ISA 570)

LTV ratio approaching covenant breach levels

Upcoming loan maturities without confirmed refinancing

Vacancy rates increasing above 15%

Key tenant default or lease break option exercise

Property valuations declining more than 10% year-on-year

Interest coverage falling below covenant minimum (typically 1.5x)

Worked Example: European Commercial Property Company

UrbanCore Properties NV — commercial real estate portfolio valued at €120M

Key results: Current Ratio: 0.63 (typical — most assets are non-current), Net Margin: 76.5% (distorted by fair value gains), ROE: 12.5%, D/E: 1.50, Interest Coverage: 1.36x (monitor covenant), LTV implied: ~60%

Frequently Asked Questions — Real Estate

Why does my real estate company show such a low current ratio?
Real estate companies typically show current ratios well below 1.0 because their assets are predominantly non-current (investment property). A current ratio of 0.6–0.8 is normal for property companies. The key liquidity metric is whether rental income covers debt service, not the current ratio. Focus on interest coverage and debt service coverage ratios instead.
How do property revaluations affect financial ratios?
Under IAS 40 (fair value model), unrealised gains and losses on investment property flow through profit or loss. This means net margin, ROE, and ROA will be extremely volatile — a €100M portfolio with a 5% revaluation shows €5M in unrealised profit that distorts all profitability ratios. For ISA 520 analytical procedures, strip out revaluation movements to analyse underlying operational profitability from rental income.
What is a typical LTV ratio for European real estate?
European commercial real estate typically carries LTV of 45–65%. Residential portfolios may achieve lower LTV (35–55%) due to perceived lower risk. Prime office in Tier 1 cities may secure financing at 55–65% LTV, while secondary assets or development projects rarely exceed 50% LTV post-2008. Covenant LTV limits are typically set at 60–70%, with margin calls triggering at higher levels.
How should I assess going concern for property companies under ISA 570?
Focus on debt covenant compliance (LTV, interest coverage, debt service coverage), refinancing risk (upcoming loan maturities vs. available refinancing), tenant default risk (vacancy rates, lease break options), and property valuation trajectory. A property company approaching LTV covenant breach with upcoming refinancing is a significant going concern indicator.
What IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy level applies to property valuations?
Most investment property valuations are Level 3 inputs under IFRS 13 because there are no quoted market prices for individual properties. This means the valuations rely heavily on unobservable inputs (discount rates, capitalisation rates, rental growth assumptions). The auditor should assess the competence of the external valuer, challenge key assumptions, and test sensitivity of the portfolio value to changes in yield assumptions.